Thursday, March 13, 2025
Home Blog Page 22

Queensland Makes History as Coercive Control Recognized as a Crime

In an unprecedented move, Queensland’s parliament has passed legislation that will see coercive control in relationships criminalized, marking a significant step forward in the fight against domestic abuse. This landmark decision has sparked conversations across the nation about the nature of abusive relationships and the hidden dangers of coercive behavior.

The newly passed legislation introduces a standalone offence for coercive control, carrying a hefty penalty of up to 14 years in prison. Coercive control encompasses a range of manipulative, isolating, and controlling behaviors within a relationship, including but not limited to verbal abuse, financial domination, emotional manipulation, and social isolation. Premier Steven Miles emphasized the significance of this move, stating, “Coercive control might be subtle but it is insidious and it does cost lives.”

Tireless Advocacy and Education as Key to Change

ABC News reports that the push for this legislation was fueled by years of advocacy and the tragic stories of victims and survivors of domestic and family violence. Minister for Women Shannon Fentiman highlighted the pivotal role that advocacy played, particularly in the wake of the murders of Hannah Clarke and her three children. This tragedy, along with the murder of Allison Baden-Clay in 2012, brought the issue of coercive control to the forefront of public consciousness in Queensland.

The legislation also owes much to the courageous individuals and families who have come forward with their stories, advocating for change. Lloyd Clarke, whose daughter Hannah Clarke’s murder was a catalyst for the legislation, emphasized the importance of community education on the issue. “The state government has listened to the lived experience of victims and survivors, but now we must work together to educate Queenslanders to recognize coercive control red flags,” he said.

Labor MP Jonty Bush, who shared her personal connection to the issue through her sister’s murder, underlined the importance of the bill in capturing the nuanced patterns of coercive control. “This bill — against a backdrop of many years of advocacy by the community, by victims, by survivors and by groups, and the education and reform piece that has gone into this — will capture that pattern of behaviour that is, by definition, coercive control and it will recognise that as a crime in and of itself,” Bush stated.

The legislation’s passage was met with broad support, including from Shadow Attorney-General Tim Nicholls, who acknowledged the importance of addressing the “black heart of behaviour” seen in coercive control scenarios. The new laws also introduce offences for those aiding perpetrators of domestic abuse — such as contacting, intimidating or surveilling a person – on behalf of a person named in a domestic violence order. This further widens the net to catch those facilitating abusive environments.

Queensland’s bold step towards criminalizing coercive control represents a monumental shift in the legal landscape, recognizing the complex and often hidden dynamics of abusive relationships. As the state and its communities work towards greater awareness and prevention, this legislation stands as a beacon of hope for victims and survivors, promising a safer, more just future.

Report Shows Coercive Control Role in Domestic Violence Deaths

Coercive control role in domestic violence deaths.

In a comprehensive review spanning two decades, coercive control has been identified as a critical factor in almost all domestic violence deaths in Canberra, Australia.

ABC News reports that over the span of twenty years, the Australian Capital Territory (ACT) has witnessed over 130 fatalities attributed to domestic violence. A thorough examination of 12 specific cases within this group uncovered that nearly all of them involved elements of coercive control, a form of abuse which manipulates and restricts the victim’s autonomy and freedom.

Notably, the study found that 75% of these cases did not involve physical violence prior to the death, emphasizing the lethal potential of psychological and emotional abuse.

The report also highlighted the disproportionate impact on culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) communities, where domestic violence and coercive control often remain underreported and unrecognized. This finding points to the urgent need for targeted education and support services within these communities.

Advocates and officials have responded to the report’s findings with calls for increased education on the nuances of domestic violence and coercive control in Australia.

Heidi Yates, the ACT’s Victims of Crime Commissioner, stressed the importance of recognizing the varied manifestations of abuse and intimidation. “It may be about stopping where someone goes in the community, stopping them from spending time with friends and family, controlling what they wear or what they eat or access to finances,” Yates explained [via ABC News], highlighting the diversity of control tactics that can precede lethal outcomes.

Sue Webeck, CEO of the ACT’s Domestic Violence Crisis Service, echoed the need for a better understanding and response to coercive control, which often does not fit traditional notions of abuse. “It is the subversive looks that have a threatening consequence to them. It is the fact that someone is put into position where they second-guess their own decision making,” Webeck said, underlining the subtlety and complexity of coercive behaviors.

Monitoring Legislative Responses

The ACT government is closely watching developments in other jurisdictions regarding the criminalization of coercive control.

With recent legislative changes in Queensland and proposed laws in New South Wales introducing penalties for coercive control offenses, the ACT is considering similar moves.

Currently, coercion is recognized as a form of family violence under the Family Violence Act in the ACT, allowing affected individuals to seek family violence orders (FVOs). Breaching an FVO carries significant penalties, including up to five years in prison or an $80,000 fine.

As the conversation around coercive control and its criminalization continues, advocates emphasize the critical need for comprehensive education and communication campaigns. These efforts aim to raise awareness within the community and among those responsible for responding to domestic violence, ensuring a more informed and effective approach to combating this hidden epidemic.

Fashion Consultant Has Life Cut Short by Coercive Control

Tracey Ratcliffe ended her life after being subjected to coercive control.

In a tragic and disturbing case that shocked the community of Sale, Greater Manchester, Tracey Ratcliffe, a 53-year-old fashion consultant, was found hanged at her home just days before Christmas, marking a tragic end to a tumultuous chapter in her life. The mother-of-two, who had recently navigated through a highly acrimonious divorce from her property tycoon husband, Nicholas Ratcliffe, 64, had been subjected to a relentless campaign of coercive control that friends and legal representatives say pushed her to the brink.

The Telegraph reports that Tracey’s lifeless body was discovered on December 22, at her £450,000 semi-detached residence, as confirmed by the Manchester South coroner’s court. The inquest, presided over by Assistant Coroner Andrew Bridgman, concluded that there were no suspicious circumstances surrounding her death, yet the backstory of Tracey’s final years paints a grim picture of manipulation and mental torment.

Coercive Control, Emotional Abuse, and Surveillance

Coercive control is a form of domestic abuse that involves a pattern of behavior by an abuser to harm, punish, or frighten their victim. This form of abuse extends beyond physical violence to include acts that deprive the victim of their liberty and autonomy.

The couple’s divorce proceedings had unveiled a disturbing pattern of behavior, with Nicholas Ratcliffe accused of employing CCTV cameras to spy on Tracey, alongside other measures designed to curtail her freedom and demean her, such as locking internal doors of their Cheshire home and leaving derogatory notes around the property. This insidious surveillance and control were highlighted during their divorce battle over a £6.9 million fortune, which culminated in Tracey being awarded £3.45 million in 2020.

Despite the financial settlement, friends and legal representatives articulate a narrative of ongoing control and harassment by Nicholas, with attempts to appeal the divorce payout seen as further efforts to exert control. The Court of Appeal sided with Nicholas on the appeal, leading to an adjustment to the allocation of the family’s fortune.

Anne Hussey QC, representing Mrs. Ratcliffe, lamented the ruthless tactics employed by Nicholas, especially given Tracey’s fragile mental state. “Despite being aware of her fragile mental health, the husband showed a deplorable level of control and embarked on a campaign designed to drive the wife from the family home,” she stated [via The Telegraph].

Tracey’s passing has left a void in the lives of those who knew her, with friends mourning the loss of a vibrant, kind-hearted individual who was “always dressed to the nines” and considered “an absolute diamond of a friend.” Her tragic departure underscores the devastating impact of coercive control, a sinister form of abuse that continues to claim lives and destroy families, often behind the closed doors of seemingly normal households.

Tracey Ratcliffe’s tragic death brings to the forefront a legal debate taking place in the UK concerning the attribution of criminal responsibility in cases where victims of prolonged emotional abuse take their own lives. This discussion centers on whether a charge of manslaughter should apply in circumstances where the abusive conduct of the defendant significantly contributes to the victim’s death, without necessarily intending or foreseeing it.

It is both important and welcome that efforts are being made to enhance both civil and criminal protections for survivors of domestic abuse in the UK. However, achieving true justice for all victims, particularly those whose lives have been cut short due to their abuser’s actions, demands a more critical examination of the effectiveness of criminal law in cases where domestic abuse leads to the victim’s suicide.

As the community mourns the loss of Tracey Ratcliffe, her tragic story highlights the often-invisible nature of coercive control and emotional abuse and underscores the urgent need for society to acknowledge and confront the pervasive issue of domestic abuse in all its manifestations.

Featured image: Tracey Ratcliffe. Image Source: Yahoo News.

Can an Abuser Ever Really Love You?

Can an abuser really love you?

Navigating a relationship filled with both declarations of love and actions of control or abuse is a bewildering and heart-wrenching experience. Those ensnared in such dynamics often confront a deeply troubling question: Does my partner really love me? This question touches the heart of many abusive relationships, especially those characterized by coercive control. Coercive control is a pattern of behavior that seeks to dominate the victim’s life through intimidation, degradation, isolation, and control.

Coercive control represents a strategic form of ongoing psychological and emotional abuse aimed at entrenching dominance. Experts like Evan Stark, who coined the term “coercive control,” argue that such behavior is about power and domination. This is far removed from any notion of love. Stark emphasizes that coercive control creates a complex web of entrapment that can, at times, be more debilitating to the victim than physical harm.

Why Do Abusers Abuse?

The motivations behind abuse are complex and multifaceted. Often, abusers have a need for power and control that stems from their own insecurities, past traumas, learned behaviors, or pathologies. Psychological studies suggest that some abusers may equate love with control. They, in fact, believe that their controlling behaviors are expressions of love. However, this belief system is fundamentally flawed and damaging.

Can Someone Love You and Abuse You?

Psychologists explain that while many abusers may think or believe that they love their partners, their understanding of love is completely distorted. Dr. Lisa Aronson Fontes, a senior lecturer at the University of Massachusetts Amherst and author of ‘Invisible Chains: Overcoming Coercive Control in Your Intimate Relationship,’ notes that abusers often see their possessive and controlling behaviors as expressions of deep connection and love. For instance, they may say that they won’t let their partner out of their sight because they love them and want to protect them. They mistakenly believe that their actions are justified because of the intensity of their feelings toward their partner. This belief system, Fontes points out, blinds abusers to the destructive impact of their behavior.

Dr. Judith Herman, a psychiatrist and professor at Harvard Medical School and author of ‘Trauma and Recovery: The Aftermath of Violence – from Domestic Abuse to Political Terror’, suggests that the dynamics of abusive relationships often mimic those of captor and captive, where the abuser’s proclamation of love serves to confuse and bind the victim to the relationship. The manipulation creates a complex web of emotional entanglement. This makes it difficult for victims to recognize that the abuse they are experiencing is absolutely incompatible with the claims of love being made by their abusers.

Dr. Herman maintains that genuine love means respecting the humanity of the other person, wanting what is best for them, and supporting their self-esteem and independence. This conception of love stands in direct opposition to the control, fear, and diminishment inflicted by abusers. Herman’s work emphasizes that true affection and care cannot coexist with abuse, as genuine love nurtures growth and autonomy rather than seeking to erode it.

How Do Abusers View Love?

Lundy Bancroft, in his seminal book ‘Why Does He Do That? Inside the Minds of Angry and Controlling Men,’ suggests that while abusers may experience intense feelings they identify as love, such emotions are far removed from the essence of true affection and care.

The abusive partner’s notion of love is intertwined with a desire to control, possess, and demand complete attention from their partner, misconstruing possessiveness for genuine connection. This misunderstanding leads to the absurd justification of abuse as an act of love. Through his extensive experience counseling abusers, Bancroft shares alarming statements that have been shared with him by perpetrators, revealing their twisted perception of love, such as:

“I told her she’d better not ever try to leave me. You have no idea how much I love this girl!” and,

“The reason I abuse her is because I have such strong feelings for her. You hurt the ones you love the most.”

Bancroft emphasizes that real love is characterized by respect for the other’s humanity, encouragement of their independence, and a desire for their overall well-being. These principles are inherently incompatible with the dynamics of abuse. Genuine love, he explains, cannot coexist with the desire to control and dominate another person. Instead, what abusers regard as love is often a blend of possessive desires—for unwavering devotion, exclusive sexual access, and the admiration of others.

Misconstrued Love

While abusers may believe they love their victims, the reality is that their actions speak louder than words. Love cannot coexist with fear, control, and subjugation. The assertion of love in the context of abuse is often a manipulation tactic used to keep the victim tethered to the relationship, making it harder for them to leave.

For anyone living through this, know that true love respects your autonomy, nurtures your growth, and feels safe. If you find yourself questioning the love in your relationship because of abusive behaviors, it might be time to seek support from professionals or organizations dedicated to helping victims of domestic abuse. Recognizing the difference between possessive desires and genuine love is an important step for breaking free from the cycle of abuse and moving towards a future defined by healthy, supportive relationships.

References:

Bancroft, L. (2002). Why Does He Do That? Inside the Minds of Angry and Controlling Men. New York: Berkley Books.

Fontes, L. A. (2015). Invisible Chains: Overcoming Coercive Control in Your Intimate Relationship. New York: Guilford Press.

Herman, J. L. (1992). Trauma and Recovery: The Aftermath of Violence – From Domestic Abuse to Political Terror. New York: Basic Books.

Stark, E. (2007). Coercive Control: How Men Entrap Women in Personal Life. New York: Oxford University Press.

Featured image: Does an Abuser Love You? Image: JUrban / Public domain.

Coercive Control in the Digital Age: Cyberstalking and Online Manipulation

Digital coercive control includes cyberstalking.

The rise of digital technologies has transformed many aspects of our lives, offering new avenues for communication, learning, and engagement. However, these advancements also come with a dark side: the increasing prevalence of cyberstalking and online manipulation, a phenomenon that can be broadly categorized under digital coercive control (DCC).

Coercive control, a pattern of behavior aimed at dominating and manipulating another individual, has found fertile ground in the digital realm. As technology evolves, so do the methods through which abusers exert control over their victims through stalking.

Understanding Coercive Control

Coercive control is a form of intimate partner violence characterized by tactics aimed at undermining a person’s autonomy and agency. Evan Stark’s 2007 seminal work, ‘Coercive Control: The Entrapment of Women in Personal Life,’ revealed the nuanced and often overlooked dynamics of domestic abuse, challenging traditional perceptions that focus solely on physical violence. Stark introduced the concept of coercive control to describe a pattern of behavior that extends beyond physical harm. It encompasses psychological abuse, sexual abuse, verbal abuse, financial abuse, and emotional abuse tactics aimed at entrenching a victim in a state of dependency and subjugation.

The Evolution of Abuse: Technology’s Role

With the widespread adoption of smartphones, social media platforms, and other digital tools, abusers have found new avenues to exert control over their victims. Cyberstalking, for instance, enables perpetrators to monitor their victims’ online activities, and track their location through GPS. They may even hack into their devices to gain access to personal information. The anonymity afforded by the internet also emboldens abusers, allowing them to harass, intimidate, and threaten their victims with impunity.

Recent research has shed light on the alarming prevalence of technology-facilitated abuse. A study published in the Journal of Interpersonal Violence found that over 70% of domestic violence survivors had experienced some form of cyberstalking (Edwards, 2022). Moreover, advancements in artificial intelligence have raised concerns about the potential use of deepfake technology. This tech can create manipulated videos or audio recordings, further complicating the landscape of online manipulation and coercion.

Another study published in the Journal of Cybersecurity Research found that cyberstalking victims often experience significant psychological distress and impaired functioning. This includes increased symptoms of anxiety and depression, lowered self-esteem, sleep disturbances, increased vigilance and paranoia, social withdrawal, and isolation. This underscores the urgent need for effective intervention strategies (Smith et al., 2023).

Addressing the Digital Dangers: Awareness and Solutions

Addressing digital coercive control requires a multifaceted approach that involves legal, social, and technological interventions. While there have been efforts to legislate against such behaviors, enforcement remains challenging due to the diffuse nature of the internet and digital communications. Advocacy and awareness campaigns play a critical role in educating the public about the realities of digital abuse and the importance of supporting victims.

In addition to raising awareness, policymakers and tech companies must collaborate to develop robust safeguards against online abuse. This includes implementing stronger privacy protections, enhancing security measures to prevent unauthorized access to personal data, and providing training for law enforcement professionals to effectively respond to reports of cyberstalking and online harassment.

Coercive control in the digital age presents complex challenges that require concerted efforts from individuals, communities, and institutions. By understanding what digital coercive control is, recognizing the power dynamics at play, and working together to create safer online environments, we can take significant steps toward protecting individuals from this heinous form of abuse.

References

Edwards, K. M. (2022). Technology-facilitated abuse: Implications for survivors of intimate partner violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(1-2), 3-27.

Smith, J. R., Johnson, L. M., & Williams, E. D. (2023). The impact of cyberstalking on psychological well-being: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Cybersecurity Research, 12(4), 589-605.

Stark, E. (2007). Coercive Control: The Entrapment of Women in Personal Life. New York: Oxford University Press.

Featured image: Woman persecuted on the internet (Photographee.eu / Adobe Stock)

Mel B Speaks Out – Financial Abuse is Part of a Controller’s Arsenal

Mel B and Stephen Belaphonte

Control can manifest in numerous ways, but one of the most overlooked forms it takes is financial abuse. This subtle aspect of coercive control can leave victims feeling trapped, with no means of escape. The recent revelations by Melanie Brown, famously known as Mel B from the Spice Girls, highlight just how devastating financial abuse can be, even for those who seemed to have it all.

The Independent reports that Mel B’s journey from international fame and financial independence to being left with a mere £700 in her bank account is a stark reminder that financial abuse can happen to anyone, regardless of their status or wealth. In a candid interview, Mel B detailed the transition from performing at sold-out venues to shopping at discount supermarkets like Aldi.

Mel B Speaks Up About Violence and Coercive Control

Mel B’s decade-long marriage to Stephen Belafonte began with what she initially perceived as acts of love and care, but she eventually recognized these gestures as early signs of coercive control—a concept she was unfamiliar with at the time. Belafonte’s manipulation started with seemingly small actions, like buying her clothes he preferred, subtly dictating her wardrobe choices under the guise of affection. This control extended to limiting her communication with her family, gradually isolating her from her support network.

Mel B shared how these manipulative tactics are shockingly common among abusers, effectively stripping away victims’ autonomy and making them increasingly dependent on their abusers. Her 2018 memoir, ‘Brutally Honest,’ reveals the dreadful reality of her daily life, detailing allegations of physical, sexual, verbal, and financial abuse.

As Mel B navigated through the complexities of her abusive relationship, she faced significant challenges in attempting to leave Belafonte. “I tried to leave seven times, so you can imagine how desperate I was in those 10 years. I didn’t have anywhere to go, I didn’t have my own credit card, I didn’t have a car, I’ve got three kids, I was on the very edge of self-destruction” Mel shared in a 2021 interview.

Her struggle underscores the profound impact of coercive control on a person’s ability to leave an abusive situation. It took immense courage and desperation for Mel B to finally break free from the cycle of abuse, highlighting the difficult journey many victims face in regaining their sense of self and independence.

Financial Abuse Leaves Women Feeling Trapped

Financial abuse is one of many strategies employed by abusers to dominate their victims. It often leaves victims financially dependent on their abusers, which significantly limits their ability to leave the abusive situation. These are some of the many forms that financial abuse can take:

·       Restricting Access to Bank Accounts

·       Controlling All Household Finances

·       Withholding Money for Basic Necessities

·       Stealing Money or Assets

·       Forcing the Partner to Hand Over Their Paychecks

·       Sabotaging Work Opportunities

·       Running Up Large Amounts of Debt on Joint Accounts

·       Taking Out Loans in the Partner’s Name

·       Refusing to Work or Contribute Financially

·       Hiding Assets

·       Forcing the Partner to Commit Financial Fraud

·       Limiting Access to Financial Information

·       Giving an Allowance

·       Exploiting the Partner’s Resources

·       Refusing Financial Support for Children

As a campaigner for domestic abuse groups and a recipient of an MBE for services to charitable causes and vulnerable women, Mel B has dedicated her platform to raising awareness about domestic abuse. Her message is clear: coercive control and financial abuse, which is often hidden behind closed doors, must be brought into the light to prevent others from suffering in silence.

Featured image: Mel B and Stephen Belafonte at The Emeralds & Ivy Ball in Sydney, 2012 (Mel B / CC by SA 2.0)

Real Stories: Tina Rickard’s Journey from Love Bombing to Coercive Control

Tina Rickard’s* story is a harrowing yet inspiring tale of resilience, courage, and the quest for freedom from an emotionally abusive relationship that began under the guise of love and care. At 48, owning a home retail business in Newcastle, UK, and raising four children aged five to 18, Tina encountered a downward turn in her life when what seemed like a blossoming romance turned into a nightmare of coercive control and manipulation.

Whirlwind Romance, Love-Bombing and Marriage

Tina’s relationship with Derek* started like many modern love stories, on a dating app in 2015. Fresh from a period of personal tragedies, including a divorce and the sudden death of her ex-husband, Tina was vulnerably navigating the waters of single parenthood and longing for companionship. Derek entered her life with what appeared to be open arms and a caring heart. His small, thoughtful gestures, such as offering to carry her shopping basket, signaled a level of attentiveness that initially touched Tina deeply.

However, these early signs of affection soon revealed themselves to be the first steps in a calculated process of love bombing. This is a well-known manipulative tactic often employed in the early stages of a relationship, where the perpetrator showers their partner with excessive affection, attention, and gifts in order to gain their trust and affection quickly. This behavior is characterized by grand gestures, constant compliments, and an overwhelming presence in the victim’s life, creating an intense emotional connection.

Derek waited little time before he declared his undying love for Tina, proposed marriage, and insisted on moving in together. These were not the acts of a smitten lover but red flags indicating an unhealthy need for control and dominance.

Derek’s Coercive Dominance Over Tina

Once Derek had moved in, the veil lifted, and his true nature became apparent. He began to exert control over Tina’s life in increasingly invasive ways, from snooping on her social media accounts to blocking her friends and interrogating her about past relationships. His manipulation extended to emotional blackmail, using his past and vulnerabilities to bind Tina closer, creating a cycle of abuse known as ‘trauma bonding.’

Trauma bonding occurs when cycles of abuse are interspersed with periods of kindness and affection. The inconsistency of the abuser’s behavior—alternating between hostility, aggression, and moments of love and care—creates a confusing array of emotions in the victim, leading to a dependency that is difficult to break.

Derek’s jealousy and obsession with Tina’s exes reached irrational heights, leading him to stalk not only Tina but also those from her past, attempting to isolate her further and tighten his grip on her life. His coercive behavior escalated to the point where even Tina’s work and interactions with colleagues were under his scrutiny, demonstrating a disturbing level of surveillance and control.

Fracturing Family Bonds: Derek’s Manipulation Extends to Tina’s Daughter

The turning point came when Derek’s manipulative behavior began to directly impact Tina’s children. An altercation with her 14-year-old daughter, followed by gaslighting attempts to deny the incident, highlighted the toxic environment he had created. This act of aggression towards her child was the catalyst for Tina to recognize the severity of her situation. Her maternal instincts propelled her to take action, marking the beginning of the end of Derek’s presence in their lives.

Red Flags and The Path to Recovery

Tina’s escape from this coercive relationship was not immediate. Even after asking Derek to leave, his attempts to maintain control persisted through uninvited visits and continuous monitoring of Tina’s social media. It was only through the intervention of the police and the support of organizations like Women’s Aid that Tina began to understand the full extent of the abuse she had endured.

In sharing her story, Tina aims to educate others about the signs of coercive control and the importance of trusting one’s instincts when red flags arise. Her experience underscores the critical need for awareness and support for victims of such insidious forms of abuse.

Tina’s account was originally reported by Yahoo Life UK.

Understanding and Recognizing Coercive Control

Understanding coercive control

Domestic abuse encompasses far more than just physical violence. It often includes a less visible, yet deeply damaging form of abuse known as coercive control. This is characterized by a consistent pattern of controlling, coercive, and intimidating behaviors by a current or former partner.

Through these tactics, one partner seeks to dominate the other by exerting power over every facet of their life. It effectively traps the victim in an invisible prison of manipulation and fear.

According to Australia’s National Research Organisation for Women’s Safety (ANROWS, 2021), coercive control is “the ongoing and repetitive use of behaviors or strategies to control a current or ex intimate partner and make them feel inferior to, and dependent on, the perpetrator.”

The fact that it can occur without physical violence presents unique challenges for legal recognition and makes it difficult to prove in court.

Evan Stark originally developed the term and its conceptual framework in his 2007 seminal work, “Coercive Control: The Entrapment of Women in Personal Life.” Stark’s research played a crucial role in highlighting how coercive control is central to understanding the most dangerous and damaging forms of domestic abuse.

Stark criticized the criminal justice system’s limited view of domestic abuse as individual episodes of physical violence. He argued instead that the continuous application of controlling tactics—including emotional abuse, social isolation, economic restriction, and manipulation—constitutes a more pervasive and damaging form of abuse.

Recognizing Coercive Control

Victims of coercive control might not realize or be able to express that the things they are experiencing in their relationship are part of a pattern of coercive behavior. However, controlling behavior often escalates throughout the relationship and even after a relationship ends. This significantly heightens the danger and risks to the victim’s physical safety. It is, therefore, crucial to recognize the signs of coercive control.

Coercive control functions through various manipulative tactics aimed at undermining the victim’s autonomy, self-worth, and independence. While the specific forms of coercive control can differ significantly across different relationships, they typically involve one or more of the characteristics described below.

71. Verbal and Emotional Abuse

Verbal and emotional abuse are critical aspects of coercive control. This form of abuse includes actions like criticizing, belittling, name-calling, mocking, and insulting, which perpetrators use to humiliate, degrade, and diminish the victim’s self-worth.

Controlling partners frequently employ tactics such as gaslighting, where they cause victims to doubt their sanity or memories.

Abusers also manipulate emotions strategically, alternating between affection and cruelty to condition the victim into compliance. This pattern creates an environment where the victim feels unable to leave the relationship despite the harm they are experiencing.

62. Controlling Acts

Coercive control often manifests through the micromanagement of a victim’s everyday life. This can include stringent rules that dictate minute details of the victim’s activities, from their appearance and diet to their social interactions and leisure activities.

More extreme forms of control can force the victim into major life decisions against their will, such as marriage, moving abroad, or quitting a job. These actions further isolate them and deepen their dependency on the abuser.

Abusers often set unreasonable curfews, enforce strict schedules, monitor communications, or make surprise appearances at their partner’s workplace or social gatherings. These acts constantly remind the victim of the perpetrator’s presence and power, further entrenching the dynamics of fear and submission in the relationship.

53. Physical or Sexual Violence

Physical or sexual violence may not always be present in relationships marked by coercive control. However, when present, these acts become powerful tools of terror and manipulation.

Perpetrators might employ a range of intimidating behaviors, such as blocking exits, clenching fists, slamming doors, or throwing objects near the victim to instill a constant sense of threat. Driving dangerously, making threats of violence, or displaying weapons provide a clear signal of their capacity and willingness to cause harm.

More severe actions involve sexual assault and direct violence against the victim, their loved ones, or their property, intensifying the atmosphere of fear and compliance.

44. Isolation from Support Systems      

Isolation is a critical tactic in coercive control, where perpetrators work methodically to cut off victims from their external support networks. By doing so, they foster a crippling dependency, making the victim feel that the abuser is their only source of support.

The control may begin with subtle suggestions that certain friends are not looking out for their best interests. It may then move into outright accusations of family members being intrusive or disruptive to the couple’s relationship. Over time, these suggestions can escalate into demands. The abuser might explicitly forbid the victim from seeing specific people or attending social gatherings.

This breakdown of social connections is devastating, stripping the victim of any potential refuge or ally and embedding the abusive dynamics more deeply into their everyday life. As a result, it significantly hinders their ability to seek help or leave the abusive environment.

35. Monitoring, Surveillance, and Stalking

The use of technology to monitor and surveil the victim’s every move is another common tactic employed by perpetrators of coercive control. This intrusive behavior may include the installation of hidden cameras and GPS trackers on personal belongings or vehicles.

Abusers often check phones, emails, and social media without consent, frequently call or message, and may even use software to observe and control digital devices remotely. Such constant surveillance strips the victim of any sense of privacy or safety.

26. Financial Exploitation

Abusers often control finances to ensure their partner becomes economically dependent on them. This financial abuse may extend to interfering with the victim’s employment or education, misappropriating their income and assets, and dictating how much money they can use.

Abusers often coerce their partners into making large financial expenditures or take over their financial decisions completely. They may force their partner to accrue debt or manipulate expenses to create instability. Perpetrators may also restrict the victim’s access to work or dictate where and when they can work.

By creating an environment of instability around work and money, abusers leave victims isolated and vulnerable, making it exceedingly difficult for them to seek help or escape the abusive situation.

17. Manipulation of Children

Manipulation of children in abusive relationships is a particularly heinous tactic where abusers exploit children as tools of coercion. Perpetrators may threaten to harm or take away the children as a way to prevent their partner from leaving them.

When a victim leaves their abuser, they often manipulate child custody arrangements and maintenance payments. They might direct the children to spy on their other parent, or disrupt the children’s schedules.

Such actions not only weaponize the children within family law proceedings but also profoundly impact their wellbeing and the parent’s ability to function effectively, both personally and professionally.

Diverse Tactics of Control

In addition to these common coercive tactics, control within relationships can take on many diverse forms. Perpetrators may coerce their victims into criminal activities, neglect their medical needs, or misuse religious beliefs by mocking or hindering the victim’s spiritual practices. They might use technology or societal expectations to discredit victims, such as threatening to disclose private information.

Another sinister aspect of control is reproductive coercion, where abusers dictate aspects of a victim’s reproductive health, such as access to or use of birth control or decisions around pregnancy.

Substance control is also common, with perpetrators fostering their partner’s dependency on drugs and alcohol or controlling their access to these substances.

Furthermore, threats of institutionalization and false allegations to authorities are tactics used to limit a victim’s autonomy. Abusers may also restrict access to essential healthcare or withhold legal documents like passports or visas to deepen the victim’s entrapment.

These multifaceted strategies of coercion ensure that victims remain isolated, dependent, and firmly under the control of their abuser.

The Price of Resistance

Coercive control operates through a pervasive and calculated scheme of intimidation, where the perpetrator establishes a regime of fear and compliance. A sense of threat looms constantly over the victim, signifying the severe repercussions of disobedience. As Evan Start notes, “Coercive control is the perpetrator establishing in the mind of the victim the price of her resistance.”

The victim learns to expect and fear punishment for not meeting their partner’s expectations. The victim’s life is dominated not just by actual incidents of abuse but by the ongoing possibility of such incidents, making resistance seem as dangerous as it is futile. These dynamics underscore the chilling effectiveness of coercive control.

Coercive control represents a grave violation of human rights, robbing individuals of their autonomy, dignity, and sense of self-worth. Recognizing the signs of coercive control is crucial in providing support and resources to those trapped in abusive relationships, empowering them to break free from the cycle of abuse and reclaim their lives.

References

Australia’s National Research Organisation for Women’s Safety (ANROWS). (2021). Defining and Responding to Coercive Control: Policy Brief (ANROWS Insights, 01/2021). Sydney: ANROWS.

Home Office. (2023). Controlling or Coercive Behaviour Statutory Guidance Framework.

Katz, E. (2022.). Coercive Control in Children’s and Mothers’ Lives. Oxford University Press.

Stark, E. (2007). Coercive Control: How Men Entrap Women in Personal Life. New York: Oxford University Press.

10 Things Never To Say To Someone That Has Left an Abusive Marriage

Some comments can make things worse for abuse survivors.

Leaving an abusive marriage is an act requiring enormous courage and strength. Many women struggle for years alone under the grips of coercive control before talking about their abuse. The fear and embarrassment around exposing their ordeal, as well as the potential consequences keeps many in silence.

Well-meaning comments from friends, family, or colleagues can sometimes deepen the wounds and add to feelings of grief, guilt, and anger. Learn what not to say to a domestic violence victim.

“You guys seemed so happy together.”  

This comment dismisses their experience by focusing on what can be seen from the outside and reinforces the idea that if no-one saw them being abused, then it wasn’t really happening or wasn’t that serious. Domestic abuse, especially coercive control and emotional abuse, often happens behind closed doors and out of sight. Victims usually try to maintain some sort of normal façade and hide their suffering – often for fear of the repercussions.

“I know how you feel, my partner can be so controlling too sometimes.”

One person I shared my experience with told me that they knew how I felt because their girlfriend was always monopolizing the bathroom sink! I felt completely belittled, as though I was making a fuss over nothing. Equating occasional controlling behavior with systemic, harmful patterns of abuse minimizes the gravity of their situation. Each person’s experience with control and abuse is unique and deeply personal and no one can know how you really feel.

“We don’t want to pick a side. He has always been nice to us.”

Saying this to someone who has left an abusive marriage implies that their experience of abuse is not significant. By remaining friends with an abuser, you are effectively condoning the abuse, and this contributes to the victim’s feelings of isolation and not being believed.

“Everything happens for a reason.”

This suggests that the abuse was in some way deserved or was meant for the survivor to learn something. It can make them feel as though no one is really acknowledging their pain or standing by their decision to leave an abusive partner. Everyone has their own way of making sense of bad things that happen in the world, but suggesting to a victim that there is a good reason for their abuse is not a constructive way to help.

“If it was so bad, why didn’t you leave sooner?”

This places unjust responsibility for the abuse on the survivor. It also oversimplifies the complexity of abusive relationships and fails to consider the fear, manipulation, and control tactics used by abusers, as well as potential financial, emotional, or safety barriers to leaving. Be aware that people in abusive relationships adapt their behavior and decisions to minimize their risk. It can take victims a long time to leave an abusive relationship because they may have to engage in planning and preparations in order to minimize the consequences for themselves and/or their children.

“Everyone deserves a second chance.”

Not if a person’s physical or emotional safety is at stake! This comment overlooks the patterns of behavior typical in abusive relationships, where “second chances” have often already been given and exploited. Survivors need support and validation for their decision to prioritize their safety and well-being, not suggestions that could put them in harm’s way again.

“I always knew he was controlling.”

This was said to me many times after I left my husband. Until I had done a lot of work on my healing and recovery, it really just left me feeling stupid and ashamed. This comment suggests that the abuse was obvious and can make a survivor feel judged or blamed for not recognizing or acting on the signs of control earlier.

“I know he’s made mistakes, but you should do everything to save your marriage.”

This advice disregards the survivor’s safety and well-being and implies that the responsibility for fixing the relationship lies with them, rather than addressing the abuser’s harmful behavior. Decisions about the relationship should be based on what’s best for the survivor’s physical and emotional health. Remember that each person knows their situation best, and knows the level of risk they are facing, even if that may not be clear to others. Therefore, it is never a good idea to try to impose a decision on someone (e.g. to go back to a relationship).

“I don’t understand, he seemed so nice and friendly.”

It is normal for family and friends to be in a state of shock or surprise when they first hear about the abuse, but a comment like this really invalidates a survivor’s experience by suggesting you are in disbelief based on the abuser’s outward appearance. Abusers can be charming and manipulative, and it can make a victim feel misunderstood and less likely to share their experiences.

“Why did you let him treat you like that? I would never have put up with that.”

Not only does this imply the survivor somehow allowed the abuse, but it suggests they are weak for having endured it. It also places responsibility for the abuse on the victim. Society shouldn’t be asking survivors why they allowed themselves to be abused, rather people should be asking the perpertrators why they chose to abuse their partner.

Words carry a lot of power and can have a big impact on someone navigating the aftermath of an abusive relationship. To contribute positively to a loved one’s journey of healing and rebuilding after abuse, the best approach is to offer unconditional support, listen without judgement, and validate their feelings and experiences. In an upcoming post, I’ll share specific strategies on how to use language to support those after abuse.

‘Coercive Control’ Now Considered Domestic Violence in New Jersey Law

Coercive control in New Jersey

In a significant stride towards advancing the protection of domestic violence victims, New Jersey has recently made headlines with its groundbreaking legislative reform. Joining California, New York, Illinois, Minnesota, and Washington, New Jersey is now among the first states in the U.S. to legally recognize coercive control as a form of domestic violence. According to NJ.com, the bill sets a new precedent for how restraining orders are issued and broadening the scope of behaviors considered abusive under the law.

Patch reported that, on a unanimous vote, the New Jersey Senate passed a bill mandating courts to consider patterns of coercive control when deliberating the issuance of a restraining order. This legislative action underscores a pivotal shift in understanding and addressing the complexities of domestic violence, transcending the traditional focus on physical abuse to include the subtler, yet profoundly damaging, forms of manipulation and control.

Coercive control, as defined by the bill, encompasses a range of manipulative behaviors designed to strip victims of their autonomy and independence. Among these are the deprivation of basic necessities, purposeful isolation from support networks including friends and family, and excessive monitoring of a person’s movements, communications, or finances. Such behaviors, often insidious and escalating over time, work to erode an individual’s sense of self, self-esteem, and ultimately, their freedom.

The legislative journey culminated with Governor Phil Murphy signing the bill into law, marking a historic moment for domestic violence advocacy in New Jersey. This legal acknowledgment of coercive control as a component of domestic abuse is a testament to the tireless efforts of survivors and advocates who have campaigned for a more inclusive definition of violence.

Courtney Gilmartin, a survivor and advocate for the change, voiced the foundational role of coercive control in domestic abuse scenarios. “It’s like the underpinning of it all,” Gilmartin stated [via NJ.com], underlining the importance of recognizing these controlling behaviors in legal proceedings, particularly in the context of child custody cases. The new law, she hopes, will eliminate the legal gray areas that previously left some victims without adequate protection.

The passage of this bill, initially introduced in the state Assembly in January 2022, represents a collective victory for advocates like Gilmartin and the nonprofit group New Jersey Protective Moms. Their grassroots campaign mobilized affected women to engage with legislators, sharing personal stories of coercive control to illuminate the critical need for legal reform.

This legislative breakthrough not only offers added protection under the law for victims but also signifies a broader societal recognition of the various dimensions of domestic violence. By acknowledging the coercive control tactics abusers use to maintain power over their victims, New Jersey sets an example for other states to follow, encouraging a more nuanced and effective approach to protecting individuals from all forms of domestic abuse.