Antiques expert and television personality Charles Hanson has been accused of domestic abuse, coercive control, and physical violence against his wife over a decade-long period. The allegations paint a disturbing picture of manipulation, psychological control, and repeated instances of violence within their marriage.
Sky News reports that the 45-year-old arrived at Derby Crown Court on February 10 as he faced charges stemming from a domestic incident reported to police at his £1.5 million home in Derbyshire, England, in June 2023.
Hanson, widely recognized for his appearances on Bargain Hunt, Flog It! and Antiques Road Trip, has denied all charges, which include controlling or coercive behaviour between 2015 and 2023, assault occasioning actual bodily harm in May 2020, and two counts of assault by beating in 2022 and 2023.
The case highlights the deeply entrenched patterns of coercive control, a form of domestic abuse that is often invisible but profoundly damaging. It involves psychological manipulation, isolation, threats, and domination, making it incredibly difficult for victims to leave.
Allegations of Physical Violence
Rebecca Hanson, who gave her testimony from behind a screen, described several instances of physical violence, including an attack while she was pregnant. She recalled one particularly terrifying incident when her husband allegedly put her in a headlock during an argument.
“I turned around to protect my stomach and my baby. He got me around the throat. He’s behind me with his arm around my throat, tight, with my head back… I froze. I was absolutely petrified and in shock.” [via The BBC]
She described how Hanson seemed momentarily shocked at what he had done, but the abuse did not stop there. She spoke of years of enduring controlling behaviour, being physically attacked, and manipulated into believing things would change.
On another occasion, May 2021, Mrs Hanson alleged that her husband “threatened to put burning embers from the fire” on her. She took photographs of her injuries and documented his behaviour, later showing her father evidence of bruising.
Coercive Control: The ‘Invisible’ Form of Abuse
Beyond the physical violence, Rebecca Hanson also detailed how her husband used coercive control to dominate her life. Coercive control is a strategic form of abuse where an individual exerts power over another person through fear, isolation, and manipulation.
Mrs Hanson described how her husband made decisions without her consent, disregarded her wishes, and used mind games to assert dominance.
One of the reasons coercive control is so insidious is that it keeps victims trapped in an invisible cage. The psychological impact of constant belittlement, fear, and control can be just as damaging as physical violence.
Mrs Hanson detailed how her husband’s actions made her feel as though she was losing control over her own life, with her ability to make decisions or stand up for herself being gradually eroded over time.
Why Victims Stay Silent
One of the critical issues in domestic abuse cases is why victims often do not call the police or seek immediate help. When questioned about why she did not report Hanson earlier, Mrs Hanson explained the psychological traps that keep victims from leaving abusive relationships.
“I always say ‘I’m going to call the police,’ and he knows I never will. He apologises and says he will never do it again. You think it’s going to get better. It just goes on and on and on.” [via The BBC.]
Her statement reflects a common cycle in abusive relationships: the abuser inflicts harm, apologizes, makes promises of change, and the victim, hoping for things to improve, chooses to stay—only for the cycle to repeat.
This cycle is further reinforced by gaslighting, a tactic where the abuser manipulates the victim into doubting their own perceptions and experiences. When Mrs Hanson described his abusive behaviour, his defense team attempted to portray her as being “selfish, ungrateful, and spiteful”—a classic tactic known as DARVO (Deny, Attack, Reverse Victim and Offender), where abusers deflect blame onto their victims.
In another example of manipulation, Charles Hanson denied choking his wife in a headlock, describing it as giving her a tight and affectionate hug around the shoulder.
The trial against Charles Hanson, which is expected to last up to two weeks, continues.
Featured image: Charles Hanson faces charges of coercive and controlling behaviour. Source: YouTube Screenshot / GBNews.
Victim-Blaming and the Harmful Responses Survivors Face After Abuse
Leaving domestic abuse is one of the most difficult and courageous decisions a person can make. Survivors often hope for compassion, support, and validation as they start to heal. Instead, many encounter dismissive or judgmental reactions that intensify their pain. These responses, which can even come from well-meaning individuals, reflect a lack of understanding about the complexities of abuse and its long-lasting effects.
This article examines some of the most harmful comments survivors endure, drawing on real survivor accounts. By highlighting these experiences, we aim to shed light on how victim-blaming attitudes and misconceptions can hinder recovery and offer guidance on supporting survivors more effectively.
“Just Move On”
One of the most common dismissive remarks survivors hear is, “Just move on.” This phrase trivializes the trauma, suggesting that recovery should be quick and effortless.
“Get over it and move forward. It is NOT that easy! It’s impossible to just get over this type of abuse,” one survivor shared. Abuse leaves deep emotional wounds, and healing is a lengthy, complex journey. Survivors need empathy and patience, not pressure to “move on.”
Another survivor recalled, “My dad told me to just let it go. It felt like he was brushing off everything I endured. Healing isn’t just about moving forward; it’s about untangling years of fear and pain.”
Victim-Blaming
Survivors often face comments that shift blame onto them for the abuse they endured. This victim-blaming reflects a poor understanding of the power dynamics inherent in abusive relationships.
“Why did you forget to take care of yourself? Maybe that’s why he cheated on you,” one survivor remembered being told while juggling work and caring for her sick mother and siblings. Such remarks dismiss trauma and compound feelings of guilt and shame.
Other survivors reported hearing, “What did you do to make him act that way?” or “No wonder he treated you like that.” These comments perpetuate harmful myths and invalidate survivors’ experiences.
“Why Didn’t You Leave?”
The question, “Why didn’t you leave sooner?” fails to recognize the significant barriers survivors face, including fear, manipulation, and financial dependence.
One survivor shared, “I couldn’t leave because I knew he’d find me. Every time I tried, he’d remind me of his ‘connectionsand how he’d track me down no matter where I went. I had to carefully plan every step, and even then, it felt like a gamble.”
Another explained, “It wasn’t about staying because I loved him; it was about survival. The more I resisted, the worse the abuse got. I stayed because I was afraid of what he’d do if I left.”
Victim-blaming questions shift focus away from the abuser’s actions and overlook the risks survivors face in trying to escape.
Dismissing the Severity of Abuse
Minimizing a survivor’s experiences with comments like, “It wasn’t that bad,” or “At least he didn’t hit you,” undermines the emotional and psychological toll of abuse.
“A friend said, ‘Well, he only yelled at you, right? It’s not like he was violent.’ They couldn’t understand how deeply the verbal and emotional abuse harmed me and made me feel smaller and smaller until I didn’t even recognize myself,” one survivor explained.
Another shared, “Someone told me, ‘At least you had a roof over your head.’ As if that made the constant surveillance and criticism any less damaging.” These statements invalidate survivors and reinforce misconceptions about the true nature of abuse.
Implying Shared Blame
Comments that imply shared blame, such as “Sorry things didn’t work out for you both,” can feel deeply hurtful.
“Sorry things didn’t work out…as if I had some level of participation in the destruction of my marriage,” one survivor said. “It’s yet another insult and dismissal that we somehow asked for this or had a hand in the fractured outcome of my now devastated life.”
Another recalled, “A mutual friend told me, ‘Relationships take two people to fail.’ Hearing that after everything I endured felt like being punched in the stomach—it completely ignored the abuse I suffered and put the blame on me.”
Undermining or Dismissing Experiences
Survivors often encounter disbelief or have their experiences undermined by those they trust. This can deepen feelings of isolation.
“I have several friends who still don’t fully comprehend how bad or dangerous it was for me,” one survivor shared. “The overarching theme of undermining my experience made me doubt my own experiences at a vulnerable time when I was still getting over being gaslit by him.”
Another individual shared, “I reported him to the police for strangulation, and the cop said, ‘You’re just making this up.’ They didn’t investigate. It made me feel so hopeless.”
These dismissals compound survivors’ trauma and erode their confidence in seeking help.
Betrayal by Friends and Family
The aftermath of abuse often reveals painful betrayals, as mutual friends or even family members side with the abuser.
“Mutual friends often try to straddle the fence between both of you, even when confronted with evidence of abuse,” one survivor explained. “You realize that anyone who can tolerate that behavior against their friend and still remain friends with the abuser was never really a friend.”
This betrayal intensifies survivors’ isolation and hinders their ability to rebuild a supportive network.
Pressures for Amicability
Survivors frequently face pressure to maintain a polite relationship with their abuser, even when it risks their safety. Comments like, “Can’t you try to be amicable?” or “Maybe now you can both heal,” disregard the ongoing harm and power dynamics at play.
One survivor recounted, “My mother asked if there was any way we could work it out for the kids. He had already chosen drugs, financial recklessness, and other women over his family. Hitting me was just the tip of the iceberg.”
Survivors need understanding, not pressure to appease their abuser for others’ comfort.
How to Truly Support Survivors
Supporting survivors starts with listening and offering empathy without judgment. Instead of minimizing or questioning their experiences, simply being present can make all the difference.
One survivor expressed, “I wish someone had just said, ‘You don’t have to explain anything. I’m here for you.’ That would’ve meant the world to me.” Validating their feelings and acknowledging their courage to leave is crucial. Phrases like, “What you went through was real, and it wasn’t your fault,” help combat the effects of victim-blaming and gaslighting.
Survivors have endured immense challenges. Genuine understanding and thoughtful support can make all the difference as they rebuild their lives and reclaim their sense of self.
Featured image: Victim-blaming responses. Source: fizkes / Adobe Stock.
* Quotes are drawn from survivor experiences shared publicly on the Shadows of Control Facebook and Twitter pages and have been lightly edited for spelling, grammar, or clarity.