Tuesday, September 22, 2026
Home Blog Page 28

Addicted to Love: Understanding Trauma Bonding in Emotionally Abusive Relationships

Trauma bonding is a complex and often misunderstood phenomenon, which occurs when a victim forms a strong emotional attachment to their abuser. It typically happens in the context of an emotionally abusive relationship. This trauma bond is characterized by cycles of abuse mixed with positive experiences. This creates an environment where the victim feels unable to leave the relationship despite the harm they are experiencing.

It is rooted in the dynamics of power and control, where the abuser uses various forms of emotional manipulation to create a dependency in their victim. Patrick Carnes explores this concept in his work, ‘The Betrayal Bond: Breaking Free of Exploitative Relationships,’ where he describes how these trauma bonds are forged in situations where there are repeated cycles of abuse, interspersed with positive reinforcement (Carnes, 1997). Essentially, there is a confusing blend of affection and aggression, mistreatment and apologies, and praise and criticism. This creates a paradox where the victim views the abuser, the very source of her pain, as someone who also rescues her.

In my own experience with trauma bonding, my marriage felt like an endless rollercoaster ride of highs and lows. In the so-called ‘good times’, my husband would call me his ‘princess’ and shower me with affection and gushing compliments about how amazing I was and how ‘unstoppable’ we were as a couple. During the ‘lows’, he would insult, devalue, threaten, gaslight, intimidate, belittle me, and fly into angry outbursts. As swiftly as his anger would emerge, it would dissipate, and he would come groveling after me. He would try to hold my hand, kiss me, and drape his arms around me. Despite my absolute aversion to his post-rage affection, which I would often try to avoid by locking myself in the bathroom, it still brought an immense feeling of relief.

Psychological Mechanisms in Trauma Bonding

The psychological underpinnings of trauma bonding involve a complex interplay of fear, dependency, and intermittent rewards. Judith Herman, in her seminal book ‘Trauma and Recovery,’ explains how the cycle of violence creates a situation of captivity that binds the victim to the abuser (Herman, 1992). The intermittent kindness shown by the abuser amidst the abuse can cause the victim to experience intense feelings of relief and gratitude. This reinforces the trauma bond. As one of my readers explained: “The five seconds of kindness are worth the months of ill treatment.”

In ‘Divorcing a Narcissist: The Lure, The Loss, and The Law,’ Dr Supriya McKenna and Karin Walker, who write specifically about abusers with narcissistic traits, explain that the relationship initially appears idyllic with the abuser displaying excessive affection and care. This is often through grand gestures, gifts, and professions of love. But this gradually deteriorates as subtle forms of abuse begin to surface. The victim then becomes desperate to get back the positive feelings they experienced at the start of the relationship. By this stage, she has become trauma bonded to her partner.

“They find themselves jumping through hoops to placate or win over the narcissist, who gives out varying wins (big or small) at unpredictable times. Perhaps a tiny bit of attention here and there, interspersed with an unexpectedly lavish meal or profession of everlasting love, followed by a silent treatment and then mild humiliation.” (McKenna and Walker, 2021, p.9).

Contradictory Behavior

My ex-husband’s behavior was frequently contradictory. Following long periods of acting selfishly and spending all our money on himself, he would treat me to an unexpected gift. After endless criticisms that made me feel small and unworthy, he would suddenly offer a generous compliment. After months of calling me ‘crazy’, ‘insane’, or ‘unbalanced’ for showing any hint of anger, he would then tell me how emotionally strong I was. Every time I reached my absolute level of tolerance for his verbal and emotional abuse, he would switch into praise and reward. This provided a temporary respite from the chaos of it all. It seemed like he precisely understood the limit to how much he could push me before he would need to do something to reel me back in, keeping me firmly entangled on his hook.

Addicted to Love

McKenna and Walker explain that there are more than just psychological mechanisms at play with trauma bonding. It also involves neurochemical changes in the brain, similar to what is seen in addiction.

 “This [intermittent reinforcement] throws the brain chemicals into havoc – they are sometimes depleted (when they become craved for) and sometimes sky high. From a neurochemical perspective, this is an addictive cycle, similar to the one employed by slot machines, and it’s precisely the varying unpredictable nature of the wins that keeps the victim ‘in the game,’ chemically hooked to it.” (p. 9)

Essentially, trauma bonding occurs due to a type of chemical dependency created by the inconsistent cycle of rewards. The endless highs and lows result in a constant desire and effort to return to moments of peace.

“It teaches them to try harder. To be better. To give more. To ask for less. To want less. To dance to the narcissist’s tune, and all the while, to be grateful for any scraps tossed their way.” (p. 10)

The Role of Cognitive Dissonance

“Trauma bonding explains how a victim of abuse comes to the defense of her man. We see it at play in her willingness to protect him even when she begins to see the abuse,” writes Dr David Hawkins in ‘When Loving Him is Hurting You.’

This paradoxical behavior is a direct manifestation of cognitive dissonance. This is where the victim’s desire to maintain a sense of loyalty and love for the abuser clashes with the reality of their situation. The resulting dissonance can lead to a distorted perception of the relationship. Moments of kindness from the abuser are amplified and the abuse is rationalized or diminished.

Breaking the Bond

Breaking a trauma bond requires a profound understanding of the abuse dynamics and often professional intervention. Lundy Bancroft’s work, ‘Why Does He Do That? Inside the Minds of Angry and Controlling Men,’ provides insight into the behaviors and patterns of abusers, offering victims a framework to understand their situation and seek help (Bancroft, 2002).

Therapeutic approaches, such as trauma-informed care and cognitive-behavioral therapy, have been shown to be effective in addressing the effects of trauma bonding. It helps victims to recognize the abuse and establish healthier patterns.

In ‘The Betrayal Bond,’ Patrick Carnes refers to a number of clinical strategies that can be employed to break trauma bonds. These include boundary setting strategies, helping the victim to identify healthy and unhealthy relationship patterns, trauma desensitization, work on self-acceptance and self-care, and establishing strong support networks. As he explains, “Trauma bonds can be disrupted when healthy bonds are available.” (p. 175)

Trauma bonding in emotionally abusive relationships presents a significant challenge to both victims and professionals working to support them. Understanding the psychological mechanisms at play is essential for breaking these bonds and facilitating recovery.

References

Carnes, P. (1997). The Betrayal Bond: Breaking Free of Exploitative Relationships. Health Communications, Inc.

Hawkins, D. (2017). When Loving Him is Hurting You: Hope and Help for Women Dealing With Narcissism and Emotional Abuse. Harvest House Publishers.

Herman, J. (1992). Trauma and Recovery. Basic Books.

Festinger, L. (1957). A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford University Press.

Bancroft, L. (2002). Why Does He Do That? Inside the Minds of Angry and Controlling Men. Berkley Books.

Featured image: Trauma bonding occurs in emotionally abusive relationships. Source: Adobe Stock / Lightfield Studios.

‘Angela Black’ is a Bold Reimagining of Domestic Abuse on Screen

Angela Black depicts coercive control.

‘Angela Black’, ITV’s gripping psychological thriller, delves into the harrowing realities of domestic abuse. It steers away from the typical portrayals of physical violence and brings to light the more insidious forms of psychological manipulation.

Starring Joanne Froggatt, celebrated for her performance in ‘Downton Abbey’, in the lead role as Angela, the series reveals the life of a woman who, to the outside world, seems to have it all: a beautiful home in London, a charismatic husband named Olivier (played by Michael Huisman), two adoring sons, and a busy social calendar. Yet beneath this flawless façade lies a darker reality where Angela is subjected to both physical and emotional abuse by her husband. Olivier, with his wealth, polished appearance, and charm, epitomizes the duality of a man whose sinister nature is only revealed behind closed doors.

Olivier’s Reign of Control

While the series does contain violence, the producers deliberately avoid any unnecessary or excessive portrayal of it. Instead, they focus on the subtler, more insidious elements of emotional abuse and coercive control, a pattern of behavior that includes manipulation, intimidation, and restrictions on personal freedom, aimed at dominating and subjugating the victim.

In their commitment to authenticity, the production team collaborated closely with Women’s Aid, leveraging the charity’s expertise and real-life abuse cases to accurately portray the experiences of victims and the characteristics of perpetrators.

Olivier exerts control over every aspect of Angela’s life, from dictating how much butter she puts on her toast to deciding what she should wear. He manipulates her into cutting off communication with her mother, gaslights her into believing she is forgetting things, and falsely accuses her of cheating, when he’s the one being unfaithful. He also strategically uses their children to emotionally manipulate Angela whenever she considers leaving him.

“We know from our work with thousands of women every year, that women throughout England experience coercive control every day,” writes Farah Nazeer, Chief Executive of Women’s Aid, who commented on the film series. “Coercive control is behaviour designed to make a person dependent by isolating them from support, exploiting them, depriving them of independence and regulating their everyday actions.”

Angela’s Fight for Truth

The series’ tension escalates when Ed Harrison (played by Samuel Adewunmi), a private investigator employed by Olivier to collect incriminating evidence against Angela to secure full custody of their children, turns the tables. Harrison, upon uncovering the true extent of Olivier’s malicious plans, decides to inform Angela about her husband’s sinister motives and she is forced to confront shocking truths about the man she thought she knew.

Viewers watch as Olivier’s manipulation intensifies into extreme gaslighting, pushing Angela to the brink of her sanity and resulting in her involuntary commitment to a psychiatric facility. Viewers are drawn into Angela’s harrowing journey, teetering on the edge of reality and delusion, as she strives to untangle the web of lies spun by her husband.

“What Olivier does is so disturbing; it’s the gaslighting, the mind games… And being the victim of those facets of abuse, which not everyone has understanding of, that makes the victim question who they are and gives them this sense of persistent self-doubt, which again is the type of abuse that is so common,” said Director Craig Viveiros [via Harper’s Bazaar UK].

Nazeer highlights that numerous women endure similar forms of abuse, both from their partners and from the very systems designed to safeguard them: “Just as it happens on screen, women are made to believe that they are going ‘crazy’ by perpetrators, with previous experiences of mental ill health, such as post-natal depression, being used against them. They can be branded as mentally unstable by the police, healthcare professionals and the legal system. Mental health is weaponised by social services and in the family courts – causing women to be separated from their children, just as Angela is.”

Despite its twists, melodramatic moments, and occasional overreach, ‘Angela Black’ offers a powerful exploration of a survivor’s fight against coercive control, largely due to Joanne Froggatt’s outstanding portrayal of Angela. Her performance keeps the series grounded, steering clear of trivializing or sensationalizing the topic. The series comes to a very satisfying end, and we are left cheering Angela on and all other women facing similar challenges

References

Gordon, N. (2021). Joanne Froggatt’s new drama is changing how domestic abuse is depicted on screen. Harper’s Bazaar UK.

Nazeer, F. (2021). Angela Black: The harsh reality of domestic abuse off screen. Women’s Aid. 

Featured image: Joanne Froggatt as Angela. Source: YouTube Screenshot / Spectrum Originals.

The Film ‘Alice, Darling’ Reveals the Subtle Dynamics of Emotional Abuse

‘Alice, Darling,’ directed by Mary Nighy and featuring Anna Kendrick as Alice, tackles the complex issue of coercive control. This form of domestic abuse, which involves a pattern of behavior used to exert power over a partner, is the central theme of the film. Mary Nighy and screenwriter Alanna Francis focused the story on the psychological aspects of abuse, consciously avoiding scenes of physical violence to keep the film aligned with its fundamental message.

Anna Kendrick’s role as Alice provides insight into the life of an individual ensnared in a psychologically abusive relationship. In the film, Kendrick’s character is a 30-year-old woman caught in a manipulative relationship with Simon, portrayed by British actor Charlie Carrick.

Subtle Control

Initially, Simon appears like a doting boyfriend. His actions like sending a “thinking of me?” text adorned with a kissing emoji, draping his arm around her protectively, and gently urging her to aim higher in her career appear, at first, to be signs of care and affection.

However, as the narrative progresses, glimpses of Simon’s manipulative behavior emerge, particularly through its impact on Alice. We observe her compulsively removing almost all of her body hair, reciting statistics about the harms of sugar, practicing lies about meeting her friends to avoid his criticism and approaching intimacy as a duty.

Alice displays clear signs of the intense stress caused by her relationship with Simon. The pressure of deceiving him about spending time with her friends, whom he doesn’t approve of, leads to her vomiting; similarly, misplacing an earring, which she sees as proof of her inadequacy, triggers a severe and overwhelming panic attack.

Non-Physical Abuse

Simon is never physically abusive, a fact Alice uses to downplay the gravity of her situation to her two closest friends. “He doesn’t hit me though,” she tells Tess and Sophie, who gradually come to understand how Simon’s insecurities and controlling behavior have significantly diminished Alice’s sense of self and independence.

A spokesperson for the charity Women’s Aid said: “Women in abusive relationships aren’t always aware that their relationship is unhealthy, and abusive partners often isolate a woman from her friends and support network, where conversations about relationships can often identify when things aren’t quite right.” [via the BBC]

One key moment in the film occurs when Tess and Sophie stage an intervention of sorts, convincing Alice to join them on a brief getaway. Their worry intensifies when Simon turns up unexpectedly at their holiday cottage, revealing he had checked Alice’s emails and tracked her location. It’s ultimately Tess and Sophie’s concern and support that help Alice recognize the true nature of her relationship with Simon.

‘Alice, Darling’ stands out for its nuanced portrayal of abuse, emphasizing that the absence of physical marks does not diminish the reality of a victim’s suffering. The film engages deeply with the subject of coercive control, highlighting the critical issue of belief and support for victims who bear no visible scars. It is a poignant reminder of the invisible chains of coercive control and the strength it takes to break free.

Featured image: Alice with Simon in the film ‘Alice, Darling. Image: YouTube Screenshot / Lionsgate Movies.

‘Emmerdale’ Shines a Spotlight on Coercive Control

Emmerdale shows coercive control storyline.

Emmerdale, the popular ITV soap opera, is set to delve into the insidious nature of coercive control in a domestic abuse storyline involving characters Belle and Tom King. Played by Eden Taylor Draper and James Chase, the newly married couple returns from their honeymoon, but ominous signs hint at underlying issues within their relationship.

PA News Agency reports that the plot is set to unravel the unnerving tactics of Tom King as he employs various technological means to assert dominance over Belle. This aspect of the storyline is particularly poignant. It mirrors the alarming rise in tech abuse and the use of monitoring devices that have become increasingly prevalent since the Covid pandemic.

Producer Laura Shaw emphasizes the unique ability of soap operas to shed light on the often-hidden dynamics of abusive relationships. Despite the discomfort such storylines may evoke, Shaw stresses the importance of using their platform to raise awareness and amplify the voices of survivors.

A Multifaceted Portrayal of Abuse

Emma Pickering, head of technology-facilitated abuse and economic empowerment at Refuge, applauds Emmerdale’s commitment to depicting the multifaceted nature of domestic abuse. The storyline promises to explore various forms of abuse. This includes coercive control, emotional abuse, physical abuse, and technology-facilitated abuse, exemplifying the complexities of abusive relationships.

By showcasing the escalation of abuse over time and the common tactics used by perpetrators, such as isolation from family and friends, love bombing, and manipulation, Emmerdale aims to educate viewers about the realities of domestic abuse. Pickering emphasizes the importance of informed portrayals and collaboration with experts to empower viewers to recognize signs of abuse in real-life situations.

Raising Awareness and Encouraging Help-Seeking Behavior

The inclusion of this storyline is not just about storytelling; it’s a vehicle for raising awareness and fostering understanding about an issue that impacts one in four women over their lifetime. By weaving these narratives into the fabric of popular culture, Emmerdale plays a vital role in opening up conversations about domestic abuse, its signs, and the challenges victims face in leaving abusive situations. Eden Taylor Draper, who plays Belle, expressed a keen awareness of the responsibility that comes with portraying such a sensitive issue. She hopes the storyline will not only do justice to the experiences of those who have suffered similar fates but also encourage individuals in similar situations to seek help.

Featured image: YouTube Screenshot / Emmerdale.

Netflix’s ‘Maid’ Illuminates the Shadows of Emotional Abuse

Netflix's Maid shows the realities of coercive control

Netflix’s groundbreaking series Maid brought the conversation about domestic abuse into the forefront of media discourse, challenging long-held misconceptions and illuminating the complex realities of emotional abuse and coercive control.

Released in October 2021, this 10-episode drama, inspired by Stephanie Land’s 2019 memoir, Maid: Hard Work, Low Pay, and a Mother’s Will to Survive, quickly rose to the ranks of the streaming service’s most-watched miniseries.

It centers around the life of a young mother and her daughter as they navigate the treacherous path away from an abusive relationship and offers a raw and insightful exploration into the lives of those affected by non-physical forms of domestic abuse.

The Many Faces of Abuse

The protagonist, Alex, finds herself entangled with Sean, her alcoholic and abusive partner, whose behavior epitomizes the unpredictable nature of abusers. Sean’s duality—ranging from charming, romantic, and devoted to manipulative and controlling—illustrates the psychological turmoil victims endure, often feeling trapped in a cycle of appeasement and hope for change.

For decades, the narrative surrounding domestic abuse has been narrowly focused on physical violence, but Maid has been pivotal in shifting this perspective, showcasing the equally devastating effects of emotional abuse and coercive control.

Navigating a Flawed System

As Alex embarks on her journey to freedom with her daughter, Maddy, their initial escape is fraught with challenges. With no money, housing, or job, Alex’s resilience is tested at every turn. Her interaction with social services, where she hesitates to label her experience as abuse because Sean never physically harmed her, highlights the barriers victims face. This moment in the series captures the disheartening reality for many survivors, who find themselves invalidated by a system ill-equipped to recognize the nuances of their abuse.

“What am I going to do, call the police and say he didn’t hit me?” Alex asks a social worker as she tries to apply for housing assistance.

Like Alex, many women grapple with both recognizing and proving emotional abuse. The physical marks of abuse, such as bruises and broken bones, can be easily documented. However, the invisible wounds inflicted by psychological abuse are less apparent, making them more difficult to see and understand.

Through the character of Danielle, a fellow survivor, Alex (and the audience) is introduced to the subtler, yet equally dangerous, precursors to physical violence.

“Before they bite, they bark. Before they hit you, they hit near you,” Danielle tells Alex.

The Cycle of Abuse and the Road to Empowerment

Maid does not shy away from depicting the cyclical nature of abuse, showing how Alex, despite her best efforts, finds herself drawn back into the tumultuous relationship with Sean. This aspect of the series reflects the grim reality that escaping an abusive relationship is seldom a linear process. It takes, on average, seven attempts to leave for good—a statistic relayed by Denise, the woman running the domestic violence shelter, who becomes a pillar of support for Alex.

The series skillfully portrays the myriad obstacles that survivors encounter, from financial instability and societal gaslighting to the daunting task of navigating public assistance systems. Yet, amidst these challenges, Maid highlights the courage it takes to break free from the shackles of abuse and the importance of support systems that offer a beacon of hope.

A Catalyst for Change

Maid is more than just a series; it’s a clarion call for awareness, understanding, and action against all forms of abuse. It challenges viewers to rethink their perceptions of domestic violence and recognizes the courage it takes to escape the shadows of abuse. It is a reminder that the journey towards healing and empowerment is fraught with challenges but, with support and awareness, is absolutely achievable.

Feature image: YouTube Screenshot / Netflix.

Alarm Over Controlling Behavior in Teen Relationships: Report Unveils Concerning Trends

A comprehensive study conducted by the Social Observatory of the La Caixa Foundation and researchers from the University of Barcelona sheds light on the worrying prevalence of controlling behaviors among adolescents in romantic relationships, signaling a need for urgent educational reform.

Disturbing Findings in Adolescent Relationships

The recent report led by researchers Noemí Pereda, Marta Codina, and Diego A. Díaz-Faes has brought to the forefront a concerning trend: 10.1% of adolescents have experienced controlling behaviors in their relationships.

The study defined controlling behavior as actions where one partner restricts the other’s interactions with friends, checks their mobile phone, or prevents them from meeting new people, among other behaviors, and these appeared to be alarmingly common.

The study, drawing from a representative sample of 4,004 students, reveals a gender disparity in victimization, with 13.3% of young women aged 14-17 reporting experiences of coercive control, compared to 7.1% of young men.

The Call for Educational Intervention

The report, which also addresses physical and sexual violence, doesn’t just highlight the prevalence of coercive control among young people; it also points to a broader issue of abuse in teen dating. With 13.6% of young people reporting victimization by some form of abuse in their romantic relationships and 4.8% admitting to perpetrating abuse against their partners, the necessity for an educational overhaul is evident.

Noemí Pereda emphasizes the potential of these behaviors to escalate into more severe forms of violence, such as physical or sexual abuse. She advocates for a significant shift in how relationships and love are taught, moving away from harmful conceptions that limit young people’s freedom and perpetuate a cycle of violence. As the report indicates, while some controlling behaviors may diminish over time and with new relationships, the underlying issue requires addressing at its root through comprehensive education reform.

The study is a wake-up call to educators, policymakers, and society at large, highlighting the urgent need to redefine and educate young people about healthy, respectful relationships.

Reference

Pereda, N., Codina, M., and Diaz-Faes, D. (2024). Teen Dating Violence. Social Observatory of the La Caixa Foundation.

Featured image: Controlling behavior in teens is alarmingly common. Image: Public domain.

Domestic Abuse Survivors Seek Reform in Family Courts in Northern Ireland

Domestic abuse in Northern Ireland

Survivors of domestic abuse in Northern Ireland are calling for significant reforms in the family court system. They are advocating for greater transparency to protect victims and their children. The push for change comes in the wake of alarming testimonies from women who have navigated the court’s proceedings. They argue that they feel re-victimized by the very system meant to protect them.

A System Under Scrutiny

ITV reports that, in the past two years, nearly 30,000 decisions have been made by the family courts in Northern Ireland, with almost 17,000 related to domestic violence and children’s orders. These proceedings, held behind closed doors, have left several women traumatized. Some have alleged threats of penal notices, contempt of court, and even the removal of their children. Women, speaking under the condition of anonymity to protect themselves and their children, have voiced their distress and the coercive control they continue to face through legal battles.

Beth (not her real name), a mother who fought to protect her three-year-old son from an abusive, drug-addicted father, shared her harrowing experience: “I ended up becoming the criminal in my case where I was trying to safeguard my child and I was being stigmatised as a vexatious mother. I was being labelled as a parental alienator. Implacable hostility was used against me.” She, like many others, has found herself penalized for attempting to protect her child. “You’re being told that you’ll be held in contempt of court if you don’t obey the court order which is a forced contact with an abusive parent,” Beth added, highlighting the paradox many victims face in seeking justice.

Post-Separation Abuse in the Legal System

One of the most damaging tactics employed by abusers in family courts is the allegation of ‘parental alienation,’ — a concept describing attempts by one parent to negatively influence their child’s perception of the other parent. These allegations are frequently directed at mothers who are reporting abuse by the father and seeking to safeguard their children from further harm. Such claims can lead to a dangerous reversal of protective measures, where victims are scrutinized, and abusers gain sympathy and leverage. This manipulation can also result in court decisions that inadvertently expose children to further harm by granting the abusive parent access or even full custody.

The challenge for the legal system is to recognize and address these manipulative tactics, ensuring that it does not become complicit in the cycle of abuse. Safeguards and reforms, such as screening for signs of coercive control during legal proceedings and providing specialized training for legal professionals, are critical steps towards protecting victims and preventing post-separation abuse from continuing under the legal system’s auspices.

Calls for Reform and Transparency

The Victims of Crime Commissioner in Northern Ireland, Geraldine Hanna, met with survivors at Stormont to discuss the need for reform. Hanna emphasized the importance of recognizing child contact as a potential tool for abusers to wield power post-separation and is planning research to understand the scale of the issue.

Justice Minister Naomi Long expressed openness to discussing the merits of increased transparency, including the possibility of media access to family court proceedings. However, she acknowledged the sensitivity of the matters discussed in family courts and the challenge of balancing transparency with the privacy and dignity of individuals involved.

Dame Siobhan Keegan, the chief justice, reiterated her commitment to ensuring that victims of domestic abuse are supported within the judicial system. She stressed the paramount importance of child welfare in family cases and advocated for transparency and public understanding of the judicial decision-making process. A pilot scheme allowing reporters into family court has recently been tested in England and Wales, signaling a potential shift toward greater openness.

A Continued Struggle for Justice

As the debate over family court reform unfolds, survivors like Beth hope that increased transparency will lead to a more just and empathetic handling of their cases. While some limited progress has been made, the journey for many navigating through a complex and often closed judicial system remains fraught with challenges. The campaign for change in the family courts of Northern Ireland continues, as survivors seek a system that truly protects and understands the victims of domestic abuse and their children.

References

Clarke, S. (7 March 2024). Survivors of domestic abuse campaign for change in family courts. ITV News.

Dalgarno, E., Meier, J., Ayeb-Karlsson, S., Pollack, D. and Katz, E. (23 October, 2023). From ‘Parental Alienation’ to [Abusers’] Child and Mother Sabotage (CAMS) as a preferable term for how perpetrator fathers intentionally sabotage the child-mother connection. Shera Research Group.

Featured image: Taking public action to end violence at home: OECD / Flickr.

UK Government Launches Lifeline ‘Flee Fund’ for Domestic Abuse Victims

In a landmark announcement earlier this year, the UK Home Office unveiled a new initiative to provide financial aid to victims of domestic abuse, aiming to offer them a safe escape from harmful situations and support in rebuilding their lives.

Financial Assistance for a Safe Escape

As of January 31, 2024, domestic abuse victims struggling with financial barriers to leaving their abusers have a new source of hope. The Home Office introduced a £2 million fund to facilitate one-off payments of up to £500, available through over 470 support services. This crucial financial support covers essential expenses such as groceries, nappies, and assistance with new accommodation, enabling victims and their children to flee to safety.

For the first time, domestic abuse victims in the UK can also secure an additional one-time payment of up to £2,500 aimed at establishing a sustainable, independent future. This could include making a rental deposit, a significant step towards moving forward and avoiding the risks of homelessness or the pressure to return to abusive environments due to financial strain.

“The most common issues – kids, lack of money and confidence, fear of reprisal – keep so many victims locked into dangerous and harmful situations for far too long,” explained Laura Farris, Minister for Victims and Safeguarding, underlining the critical nature of the support being offered.

Building on Success: The Path to Independence

This fund, set to continue until March 2025, builds upon a successful pilot program in partnership with Women’s Aid, which has already facilitated the escape of over 600 victims to safety. With the added £2 million investment, the initiative hopes to assist hundreds more in finding peace and starting anew.

“We know that victims of domestic abuse are often forced to flee with very little. These payments cover essentials like food, clothing, and nappies, and will also help them keep a roof over their heads,” stated Home Secretary James Cleverly, highlighting the practical benefits of the fund.

Women’s Aid, marking its 50th anniversary, has been re-appointed to administer this funding alongside numerous domestic abuse services across England and Wales.

Feedback from the pilot phase indicates the fund’s significant impact, with the majority of applicants using the payments to escape their abusers and to purchase essential items, improving their mental health and peace of mind. The initiative also aligns with strategic efforts to combat violence against women and girls, now recognized alongside terrorism as a national threat requiring a coordinated police response.

Melanie Brown, MBE, and patron of Women’s Aid, expressed her joy and the crucial difference the fund has made for women and children who otherwise could not have escaped abusive situations. This new ‘flee fund’ represents a vital step forward in the ongoing fight against domestic abuse, offering tangible support to those in dire need.

Queensland Makes History as Coercive Control Recognized as a Crime

In an unprecedented move, Queensland’s parliament has passed legislation that will see coercive control in relationships criminalized, marking a significant step forward in the fight against domestic abuse. This landmark decision has sparked conversations across the nation about the nature of abusive relationships and the hidden dangers of coercive behavior.

The newly passed legislation introduces a standalone offence for coercive control, carrying a hefty penalty of up to 14 years in prison. Coercive control encompasses a range of manipulative, isolating, and controlling behaviors within a relationship, including but not limited to verbal abuse, financial domination, emotional manipulation, and social isolation. Premier Steven Miles emphasized the significance of this move, stating, “Coercive control might be subtle but it is insidious and it does cost lives.”

Tireless Advocacy and Education as Key to Change

ABC News reports that the push for this legislation was fueled by years of advocacy and the tragic stories of victims and survivors of domestic and family violence. Minister for Women Shannon Fentiman highlighted the pivotal role that advocacy played, particularly in the wake of the murders of Hannah Clarke and her three children. This tragedy, along with the murder of Allison Baden-Clay in 2012, brought the issue of coercive control to the forefront of public consciousness in Queensland.

The legislation also owes much to the courageous individuals and families who have come forward with their stories, advocating for change. Lloyd Clarke, whose daughter Hannah Clarke’s murder was a catalyst for the legislation, emphasized the importance of community education on the issue. “The state government has listened to the lived experience of victims and survivors, but now we must work together to educate Queenslanders to recognize coercive control red flags,” he said.

Labor MP Jonty Bush, who shared her personal connection to the issue through her sister’s murder, underlined the importance of the bill in capturing the nuanced patterns of coercive control. “This bill — against a backdrop of many years of advocacy by the community, by victims, by survivors and by groups, and the education and reform piece that has gone into this — will capture that pattern of behaviour that is, by definition, coercive control and it will recognise that as a crime in and of itself,” Bush stated.

The legislation’s passage was met with broad support, including from Shadow Attorney-General Tim Nicholls, who acknowledged the importance of addressing the “black heart of behaviour” seen in coercive control scenarios. The new laws also introduce offences for those aiding perpetrators of domestic abuse — such as contacting, intimidating or surveilling a person – on behalf of a person named in a domestic violence order. This further widens the net to catch those facilitating abusive environments.

Queensland’s bold step towards criminalizing coercive control represents a monumental shift in the legal landscape, recognizing the complex and often hidden dynamics of abusive relationships. As the state and its communities work towards greater awareness and prevention, this legislation stands as a beacon of hope for victims and survivors, promising a safer, more just future.

Report Shows Coercive Control Role in Domestic Violence Deaths

Coercive control role in domestic violence deaths.

In a comprehensive review spanning two decades, coercive control has been identified as a critical factor in almost all domestic violence deaths in Canberra, Australia.

ABC News reports that over the span of twenty years, the Australian Capital Territory (ACT) has witnessed over 130 fatalities attributed to domestic violence. A thorough examination of 12 specific cases within this group uncovered that nearly all of them involved elements of coercive control, a form of abuse which manipulates and restricts the victim’s autonomy and freedom.

Notably, the study found that 75% of these cases did not involve physical violence prior to the death, emphasizing the lethal potential of psychological and emotional abuse.

The report also highlighted the disproportionate impact on culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) communities, where domestic violence and coercive control often remain underreported and unrecognized. This finding points to the urgent need for targeted education and support services within these communities.

Advocates and officials have responded to the report’s findings with calls for increased education on the nuances of domestic violence and coercive control in Australia.

Heidi Yates, the ACT’s Victims of Crime Commissioner, stressed the importance of recognizing the varied manifestations of abuse and intimidation. “It may be about stopping where someone goes in the community, stopping them from spending time with friends and family, controlling what they wear or what they eat or access to finances,” Yates explained [via ABC News], highlighting the diversity of control tactics that can precede lethal outcomes.

Sue Webeck, CEO of the ACT’s Domestic Violence Crisis Service, echoed the need for a better understanding and response to coercive control, which often does not fit traditional notions of abuse. “It is the subversive looks that have a threatening consequence to them. It is the fact that someone is put into position where they second-guess their own decision making,” Webeck said, underlining the subtlety and complexity of coercive behaviors.

Monitoring Legislative Responses

The ACT government is closely watching developments in other jurisdictions regarding the criminalization of coercive control.

With recent legislative changes in Queensland and proposed laws in New South Wales introducing penalties for coercive control offenses, the ACT is considering similar moves.

Currently, coercion is recognized as a form of family violence under the Family Violence Act in the ACT, allowing affected individuals to seek family violence orders (FVOs). Breaching an FVO carries significant penalties, including up to five years in prison or an $80,000 fine.

As the conversation around coercive control and its criminalization continues, advocates emphasize the critical need for comprehensive education and communication campaigns. These efforts aim to raise awareness within the community and among those responsible for responding to domestic violence, ensuring a more informed and effective approach to combating this hidden epidemic.