Tuesday, September 22, 2026
Home Blog Page 27

City Council Backs Federal Bill to Combat Coercive Control in Canada

Laurel Collins presents coercive control bill.

The Sault Ste. Marie City Council in Ontario has unanimously passed a motion to support Canada’s coercive control Bill C-332. This federal initiative aims to introduce coercive control as a standalone offence in the Canadian Criminal Code.

The motion highlights a significant step towards strengthening laws against intimate partner violence across Canada. This legislative move aligns with broader national efforts to recognize and address the severity of coercive control within relationships. It is currently is acknowledged under the umbrella of intimate partner violence but lacks specific legal standing as an independent crime.

Supported by Victim’s Families

According to SooToday, family members of victims affected by intimate partner violence witnessed the council’s unanimous decision, emphasizing the community’s strong support for the bill. Among those present was Dan Jennings, whose 22-year-old daughter Caitlin was found dead in a London, Ont. home. Her fiance, age 50, was arrested at the scene.

Caitlin’s case has become a poignant example of the dire consequences of inadequate legal protections against coercive control. “If this was already a law in place, I have no doubt Caitlin would have been saved,” Jennings expressed, a sentiment that resonated deeply during the council meeting.

Background and Implications of the Proposed Bill

Bill C-332, introduced in November 2023 by MP Laurel Collins (NDP, Victoria), seeks to amend the Criminal Code by making coercive control a distinct offence. The proposed legislation states: “This enactment amends the Criminal Code to create an offence of engaging in controlling or coercive conduct that has a significant impact on the person towards whom the conduct is directed, including a fear of violence, a decline in their physical or mental health, or a substantial adverse effect on their day-to-day activities.”

This legislative effort is spurred by tragic cases and personal stories, like that shared by Laurel Collins herself: “The first time I recognized coercive control was when my sister showed up at my doorstep in tears. Her partner had taken her cellphone and bank cards. He had taken her car keys too, but she luckily had another set. It was the first time but definitely not the last time. Over the next few years, like so many other stories of intimate partner violence, coercive and controlling behaviour eventually escalated to physical violence. I remember being scared for her life.”

National Support for the Legislation

With widespread support from both Liberals and Conservatives, the bill represents a critical step towards empowering victims and preventing the escalation of abuse. The Bill was presented to the House of Commons on 22 March. As the bill progresses, it brings hope for legal reform and a shift in how Canada handles intimate partner violence.

Sault Ste. Marie City Council’s recent support for Bill C332 illustrate a determined effort to bring about substantive changes that could prevent future tragedies similar to Caitlin’s. These steps forward in legislative reform and community support highlight a collective commitment to combat intimate partner violence. They aim to protect vulnerable individuals through clearer, more effective laws.

Featured image: Laurel Collins MP highlights proposed coercive control bill at a news conference on Parliament Hill. Image Credit: YouTube Screenshot / CPAC.

Angel Lynn’s Harrowing Story Reveals Dangers of Coercive Control

Angel Lynn

Angel Lynn, an 18-year-old college student from Loughborough, dreamed of becoming a forensic scientist. Known for her bubbly and adventurous spirit, Angel’s life took a tragic turn after entering a relationship with Chay Bowskill.

The Guardian reported that Angel’s relationship with Bowskill, also 18 at the time, began in late 2019. It didn’t take long for her mother, Nikki Lynn, to notice worrying changes in her daughter’s behavior. “Small things, individually,” Nikki recalls in a Channel 4 documentary. “I just never added them all up”.

The Subtle Signs of Coercive Control

Angel, previously meticulous about her appearance, started wearing baggy tracksuits and neglecting her hair and makeup—a stark departure from her usual self. Her social life dwindled, and her demeanor changed, especially around Bowskill. Nikki observed, “She’d be snappy if he was waiting outside in the car, suddenly agitated and in a massive rush.”

During a brief period when Bowskill was imprisoned for conspiracy to commit burglary, Angel seemed to return to her old self. However, his release reversed these improvements and the control resumed. This was highlighted by a disturbing incident where Bowskill demanded money from Angel, leading to a heated confrontation at the Lynn family home.

“He was in Angel’s face screaming: ‘I want my fucking money. You’ve spent some of it’. He was yelling about £80,” Nikki explained. “We paid him the cash, and told him to never come back again. Once he’d left, Angel turned to me and told me I was just making things worse.” Nikki has expressed deep regret that she just didn’t recognize the signs or dangers at the time.

Looking back, Nikki recognizes the patterns of coercive and controlling behavior that aimed to make her daughter dependent by isolating her from support, exploiting her, stripping away her independence, and dictating her daily activities. In the UK, such actions have been legally recognized as criminal offenses since 2015.

Kidnapping and Life-Altering Injuries of Angel Lynn

Sadly, Angel’s story ended in tragedy when, in September 2020, Bowskill and an accomplice, Rocco Sansome, abducted Angel and forced her into a van. While the vehicle sped along a major road at 60mph, Angel fell headfirst onto the road, sustaining a severe brain injury. Bowskill abandoned her in the middle of the road. To this day, it has not been proven whether Angel tried to escape or was pushed from the van, the latter being the most likely scenario.

Following the incident, authorities discovered controlling and abusive voice and text messages from Bowskill on Angel’s phone. He was subsequently convicted of kidnapping, coercive and controlling behavior, and obstructing justice.

Due to Angel’s inability to testify, the jury could not convict Bowskill of intentional grievous bodily harm. Initially, he received a seven-and-a-half-year prison sentence. However, deeming the sentence too lenient, the Solicitor General appealed, and in March 2022, the Court of Appeal extended Bowskill’s sentence to 12 years.

Angel Lynn’s Long Road to Recovery

Today, Angel faces a challenging recovery; she communicates through a tablet, cannot walk or talk, and requires constant care and various therapies. Her mother stresses the importance of education on coercive control for both young people and adults. “In schools, young people need to be taught what to be aware of from an early age. Adults need to be educated, too,” Nikki insists. She hopes sharing Angel’s story will prevent other families from enduring similar tragedies.

Angel Lynn’s ordeal sheds light on the devastating impact of coercive control, a recognized criminal offense in the UK since 2015. Her story is a grim reminder of the importance of recognizing early signs of manipulation and taking action before it escalates to irreversible consequences.

References

The Kidnap of Angel Lynn. Channel 4 documentary. Available on YouTube.

Featured image: Angela Lynn. Image: Screenshot / Channel 4 documentary.

Man Jailed for Coercive Control in Kent, UK

Man convicted for coercive control in the UK

A man from Kent in the United Kingdom has been sentenced to three years in prison after subjecting his partner to years of coercive control. Despite the UK’s legal framework against coercive control, the number of convictions remains relatively low compared to the reported incidents. While every prison term handed out for coercive control is a step forward, the low prison term sends out a dangerous message about how seriously the law treats this form of domestic abuse.

BBC reports that Grant Jeffery, a 33-year-old resident of Tonbridge, was arrested and subsequently charged with coercive and controlling behavior after years of dominating his partner’s life. Maidstone Crown Court heard how Jeffery dictated what his partner could wear, demanding she dress in loose clothing. He also isolated her from friends and family and kept home curtains closed to prevent his partner seeing anyone outside.

The abuse escalated to the point where the victim’s health deteriorated severely, leading to her hospitalization in September 2023. Even during her hospital stay, Jeffery’s controlling behavior persisted. He insisted her phone remain on video calls to monitor her constantly.

Jeffery also assaulted his partner while at the hospital and was arrested shortly afterwards. Jeffery pleaded guilty and was sentenced to three years and one month in prison, along with a 10-year restraining order.

Understanding Coercive Control Under UK Law

In the UK, coercive control became officially recognized as a criminal offense in December 2015, under the Serious Crime Act 2015. Coercive control describes a pattern of behavior by an abuser that is used to harm, punish, or frighten their victim. This can include isolating a person from their sources of support, exploiting their resources and capacities for personal gain, depriving them of the means needed for independence, resistance, and escape, and regulating their everyday behavior.

For a conviction of coercive control in the UK, prosecutors must prove that the behavior had a serious effect on the victim, including causing them serious alarm or distress that had a substantial adverse effect on their daily life.

Few Convictions for Coercive Control

Recent data indicates that while thousands of cases are reported annually, only a small fraction lead to convictions. For instance, in 2019, there were 17,616 offenses recorded under coercive and controlling behavior laws, but only 1,177 resulted in convictions. This disparity highlights challenges in both reporting and prosecuting such complex cases, where evidence of the psychological impact on victims is difficult to quantify.

A Call to Action

Detective Constable Jake Squire of the West Kent Proactive Domestic Abuse Team emphasized the importance of addressing such cases seriously, stating, “Jeffery is an aggressive bully who used threats and intimidation to exert complete control over his victim. It is right he is now serving a prison sentence and I hope this gives his victim the opportunity to repair her health and rebuild her life.”

Squire also urged anyone experiencing similar forms of abuse to seek help, reminding the community that support is available and nobody should feel trapped in an abusive situation. His message highlights the priority given to tackling domestic abuse by Kent Police and encourages victims to reach out to the police or support agencies.

Featured image: Grant Jeffery was sentenced to three years in prison. Image: Public domain.

AirTags and Stalking: A New Tool for Coercive Control and Abuse

Airtags are being used for stalking and control

The introduction of Apple AirTags has opened a Pandora’s box of privacy concerns, with the devices increasingly used in cases of stalking and coercive control. Originally designed to help people track lost items, these small, inexpensive trackers are now being exploited by stalkers and abusers to monitor their victims’ locations covertly.

Rising Concern Over Coercive Use of Trackers

In the last six years, the reported use of GPS trackers in cases of coercive control and stalking has skyrocketed by over 300%, according to ITV News. The ease of use and accessibility of AirTags, costing less than £30, have made them particularly appealing for malicious purposes. These devices, no larger than a 50p coin, can be secretly attached to almost anything, allowing abusers to track their targets in real-time.

AirTags emit a secure Bluetooth signal that nearby devices within the Find My network can detect. These devices relay the location of your AirTag to iCloud, allowing you to view its location on a map through the Find My app.

Rachel Younger, an ITV News Correspondent, highlighted that while many users appreciate AirTags for recovering lost pets or belongings, there is a darker side to the technology. A recent lawsuit in America has accused Apple of negligence, stating that AirTags have become “the weapon of choice of stalkers and abusers.” This is because they enable abusers to give “real-time location information to track victims” without detection.

The Case of Àine O’Neill

A distressing example involves Irish National Àine O’Neill, who was pursuing an acting career in California. She discovered that an AirTag had been deliberately concealed in the bodywork of her car and was being used to track her movements.

Her fear around the potential consequences of this led her to abandon her career and return to Ireland. Despite the severe impact on her life, the identity of her stalker remained unknown. This illustrates the profound challenges victims face when faced with stalking and harassment.

Law Enforcement and Safety Measures

The increasing misuse of AirTags has prompted law enforcement and safety advocates to push for better security measures. In response to the growing concerns, Apple has stated that they are working closely with safety groups to enhance AirTag safety features and prevent misuse.

As the use of these devices in controlling behavior and stalking continues to rise, the question remains about the balance between technological convenience and the potential for abuse. This ongoing issue poses difficult questions about the real cost of such conveniences. They were originally designed to make lives easier but are now complicating them in unforeseen and dangerous ways.

References

Teitel, J. and McDonald, S. (2024). Florida cracking down on cyber stalking with Apple AirTags, other hidden tracking devices. WUFT.

Younger, R. (2024). AirTags becoming ‘weapon of choice of stalkers and abusers’ as GPS tracker cases rocket by 317%. ITV.

Featured image: Apple AirTag. Source: wachiwit / Adobe Stock

Beyond Vows: Confronting Abuse in the Sanctity of Marriage

religion and domestic abuse

Marriage, often revered as a sacred bond of love, respect, and mutual support, can sometimes become a cage for those trapped in the cycle of abuse. For many women, the decision to leave an abusive marriage is not merely a matter of recognizing the toxicity they endure. It is complicated by deeply ingrained beliefs about commitment, particularly within religious communities where divorce is frowned upon. This article explores the complex dynamics of abuse within the context of marriage vows. How does religion and cultural beliefs influence the decision to leave?

Marriage Vows and Abuse

For many, marriage vows are seen as an unbreakable contract, a lifelong commitment that must be upheld regardless of the circumstances. This perception is often reinforced by cultural and religious teachings that promote the sanctity of marriage at all costs. Marriage vows are a commitment to love and cherish, but when abuse enters the relationship, it breaks the sacred trust those religious vows represent. Psychologists like Dr. Judith Herman, in her work ‘Trauma and Recovery,’ suggest that the societal pressure to maintain the facade of a perfect marriage can significantly hinder a victim’s ability to leave an abusive relationship. Victims may feel they are betraying not just their partner but also their community and their faith by considering divorce.

Many women struggle with feelings of failure for not being able to make the marriage work. They feel ashamed for breaking their marriage vows and not being able to stick it out “in good times and bad”. The stigma attached to divorce, especially in religious communities, exacerbates these feelings of shame. It makes it even more challenging for victims to seek help and choose safety over the expectations of others.

Religious Teachings and Societal Perceptions

In many religious contexts, divorce is portrayed as a failure or sin, leading women to endure abusive relationships under the guise of marital commitment. Dr. Lenore Walker, known for her groundbreaking work ‘The Battered Woman Syndrome,’ highlights how religious counseling often emphasizes forgiveness and patience over personal safety and mental health. This can create a conflict where the victim feels compelled to stay, believing that enduring abuse is somehow noble or required by their faith.

David Hawkins, author of ‘When Loving Him is Hurting You’ and a trainer for the American Association of Christian Counselors, brings to light how the Church can inadvertently perpetuate a woman’s endurance of abuse. He argues that the Church often advises women to submit and to pray. This advice is given even when they are facing an extremely dangerous situation. However, Hawkins points out that Scripture does not condone abuse in any form. He references 1 Corinthians 13, which reads that love “does not dishonor others, it is not self-seeking, it is not easily angered, it keeps no record of wrongs…It always protects” (1 Corinthians 13:4-7).

Psychological Impact of Staying in an Abusive Marriage

The psychological toll on women who remain in abusive marriages, believing they are fulfilling a marital or religious duty, can be devastating. Studies show that prolonged exposure to abuse can lead to chronic mental health issues. These include, depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Abuse, for some, can be a matter of life or death.

Dr. Bancroft, in ‘Why Does He Do That? Inside the Minds of Angry and Controlling Men,’ addresses the insidious ways abusers manipulate and isolate their partners into believing that leaving is not an option. This further entrenches the notion that abuse must be endured for the sake of the marriage. Many survivors of domestic abuse struggle with the decision to leave their spouse, as it can feel like a betrayal of their marriage vows. However, prioritizing personal safety and well-being is crucial, as marriage vows were never intended to condone or trap someone in an abusive situation.

Marriage is a partnership that should provide safety, love, and respect. The decision to leave an abusive marriage, while difficult, especially within the constraints of religious and societal expectations, is a courageous step towards reclaiming autonomy and well-being. It is crucial for communities, religious leaders, and society at large to support those facing such predicaments, ensuring they do not stand alone in their journey towards safety and healing. The vow of marriage should never be misconstrued as a vow to endure abuse.

References

Bancroft, L. (2002). Why Does He Do That? Inside the Minds of Angry and Controlling MenBerkley Books.

Hawkins, D. (2017). When Loving Him is Hurting You: Hope and Help for Women Dealing with Narcissism and Emotional Abuse. Harvest House Publishers.

Herman, J. L. (1992). Trauma and Recovery: The Aftermath of Violence – From Domestic Abuse to Political TerrorBasic Books.

Walker, L. E. (1979). The Battered Woman Syndrome. Springer Publishing Company.

Why Controlling Men Can’t Stand It When You Get Angry

In controlling or abusive relationships, the expression of anger by the partner being controlled is not just unwelcome; it can be downright unsafe.

An abuser’s disdain for his partner’s anger is not about a dislike for loud voices or heated arguments; it is about loss of control. When a woman stands up for herself, it directly challenges the abuser’s power, making him feel threatened. Abusers cannot handle their partner asserting independence or challenging their authority. Therefore, they see anger as an act of defiance. That is intolerable and unacceptable to any controlling person.

Lundy Bancroft, author of ‘Why Does He Do That? Inside the Minds of Angry and Controlling Man’, has spent over three decades working with male perpetrators of violence against women. He explains that one reason an abusive man reacts so strongly to his partner’s anger is because he considers himself above reproach. The second reason is that he senses there is power in his partner’s anger:

“If you have space to feel and express your rage, you will be better able to hold on to your identity and to resist his suffocation of you. He tries to take your anger away in order to snuff out your capacity to resist his will” (Bancroft, 2002, pp59).

Finally, he sees his partner’s anger as a challenge to his authority. He will typically respond by overpowering his partner with anger that is far greater than theirs:

“One of the basic human rights he takes away from you is the right to be angry with him. No matter how badly he treats you, he believes that your voice shouldn’t rise, and your blood shouldn’t boil. The privilege of rage is reserved for him alone” (Bancroft, 2002, p. 60).

The Abuser’s Anger

Many people believe that abusers have a problem with managing their anger and that the problem would be resolved if they were to take anger-management classes. However, Bancroft explains that abusers do not have a problem with their anger; they have a problem with their partner’s anger.

They also do not have a problem with controlling or managing anger. This evidenced by the fact that they will almost never unleash their rage in public but will wait until they are behind closed doors.

An anger management program would not help an abusive person because “his entitlements would just keep producing more anger. His attitudes are what need to change.” (Bancroft, 2002, p. 60).

At the root of an abuser’s anger is the need to dominate. They carry attitudes that produce rage and will continue to produce rage so long as their partner is not able to follow all his rules or meet all his demands. Since an abuser’s demands are unrealistic and often unattainable, it means they will be angry a lot of the time.

The Consequences of Speaking Up

When a woman dares to express dissent or anger, she will usually face criticism, dismissal, blame, gaslighting, or even more severe abuse. It will rarely, if ever, lead to the abuser understanding or reflecting on his behavior. More often than not, it will lead to an escalation of abuse.

Carol Lambert, in her book ‘Women with Controlling Partners: Taking Back Your Life from a Manipulative or Abusive Partner,’ details how abusers will often use the woman’s anger as a pretext for further abuse, framing himself as the provoked party. Phrases like “If you hadn’t gotten so angry, I wouldn’t have reacted that way” are typical. It shifts the blame and makes the woman feel guilty for her natural emotional response. This cycle of abuse and victim-blaming leads many women to suppress their anger, fearing further retaliation or misunderstanding.

A woman expressing anger might also be accused of being the truly controlling or abusive one in the relationship. Accusations such as “You’re out of control” or “You’re crazy” are common gaslighting techniques. They aim to make her doubt her own feelings and sanity. In this twisted narrative, the abuser casts himself as the victim, eliciting guilt and confusion in his partner. This leads her to believe she was in the wrong for getting angry.

“When your anger does jump out of you—as will happen to any abused woman from time to time—he is likely to try to jam it back down your throat as quickly as he can. Then he uses your anger against you to prove what an irrational person you are” (Bancroft, 2002, p. 60)

My abusive ex-husband would fly into rages if I ever dared to say ‘no’ to something he wanted or something he believed. However, if I were to ever show even the smallest hint of anger, he would tell me that I have “serious psychological issues”, that I was “crazy”, “insane”, or “didn’t know how to think.” I learned to keep my anger to myself. It simply wasn’t worth the verbal assault that would follow.

The Impact of Suppression

An abuser’s psychological manipulation effectively devalues the woman’s experiences and intimidates her into silence. The underlying message is clear: expressing anger is asking for trouble. Over time, women in such relationships learn to suppress their anger, internalizing it rather than risking further conflict. This suppression leads to confusion and a diminished ability to discern between reasonable and unreasonable anger, eroding her sense of self and her ability to stand up for her rights and needs.

Carol Lambert explains that anger is a crucial emotional signal. It indicates when boundaries have been crossed and helps individuals recognize unfair or hurtful behavior. Anger, when understood and appropriately expressed, can be a tool for holding the abuser accountable and asserting one’s rights.

However, anger is not just a sign of something wrong; it’s a necessary emotion for empowerment. It helps in understanding one’s own needs, and ultimately, in fostering a sense of strength and assertiveness. Recognizing and owning one’s anger is a step towards reclaiming independence, challenging the abusive dynamics, and moving towards a healthier self-image.

Ultimately, it is important for victims to experience and understand that their anger is a legitimate, healthy response to abuse and control.

References

Bancroft, Lundy. (2002). Why Does He Do That? Inside the Minds of Angry and Controlling Men. Penguin Publishing Group.

Lambert, Carol A. (2016). Women with Controlling Partners: Taking Back Your Life from a Manipulative or Abusive Partner. New Harbinger Publications.

10 Common Excuses Abusers Give for Their Behavior

Abusive relationships often operate under a veil of excuses and justifications that the perpertrator uses to rationalize his behavior. It’s important for victims and others to be able to recognize these excuses, including the act of excusing abuse itself, and to understand that they are forms of manipulation. This article looks at ten common reasons abusers use to justify their actions.

1. “I Love You Too Much”

Abusers often disguise their jealousy and controlling behaviors as acts of love and concern. Lundy Bancroft, in his work ‘Why Does He Do That? Inside the Minds of Angry and Controlling Men,’ discusses how abusers equate love with ownership and use their apparent “love” to justify their possessive behaviors (Bancroft, 2002).

At the start of a relationship, abusers often shower their partners with too much affection, attention, and grand gestures. This is known as ‘love-bombing’. While this might feel flattering at first, it’s actually a warning sign of their lack of respect for your autonomy and personal space. The change from apparent devotion to control is often so gradual that the victim doesn’t notice it is happening. The claim of loving “too much,” used to excuse jealousy and possessiveness, tends to reappear throughout the relationship.

2. “You Provoked Me”

The blame game is a classic strategy where abusers shift responsibility onto their partners. It suggests their actions were a direct response to their partner’s behavior. Patricia Evans highlights this tactic in ‘The Verbally Abusive Relationship,’ where abusers absolve themselves of guilt by blaming the victim for provoking them (Evans, 1996). One of my ex-husband’s favorite phrases to use when he was enraged was, “You just love making me angry don’t you?!”

This tactic deflects accountability and makes their partner believe they are at fault for the abuse they endure. Over time, this can lead to a cycle where the victim modifies their behavior in an attempt to avoid “provoking” the abuser.

3. “I Had a Bad Day”

Externalizing the cause of their abusive behavior, abusers often cite ‘a bad day’ or external stressors as reasons for his actions. Excusing abuse in this way aims to generate sympathy and understanding from his partner. It ignores the fact that he chooses to be abusive.

During the Covid pandemic, when my ex-husband’s erratic behavior and emotional abuse worsened, he said it was because he was stressed by everything going on around him. However, the reality is that most people in the world were stressed during this period, and certainly not everyone chose to become abusive!

Blaming abuse on a ‘bad day’ shifts the emotional labor onto the victim, who often feels compelled to provide comfort or forgiveness, regardless of her own emotional state. It creates a dynamic where the abuser’s needs and feelings are always prioritized. His partner’s primary role, on the other hand, is to support and placate him. Over time, the abuser’s partner comes to neglect her own emotional needs as she becomes increasingly focused on managing his reactions.

4. “I Was Just Joking”

Minimization of abusive actions through humor is a tactic discussed by Beverly Engel in ‘The Emotionally Abusive Relationship.’ Abusers belittle or degrade their partners under the guise of jokes, later dismissing any hurt feelings as the victim being too sensitive (Engel, 2002).

Using “it was just a joke” as an excuse makes the victim feel like they’re the problem for not understanding the humor or for being too easily upset. This tactic makes an individual stop speaking up about things that hurt them. They feel worried they’ll be seen as too serious or sensitive. Over time, they might start blaming themselves for feeling hurt instead of seeing the abuser’s actions as wrong.

5. “I Can’t Control It”

Abusers often deflect responsibility for their behavior by claiming that they momentarily lost control. Carol Lambert, in her book ‘Women with Controlling Partners,’ explains how this excuse is based on the false idea that abusers are helpless in the face of their impulses (Lambert, 2016).

This myth is also contradicted by the fact that abusers usually only act abusively in private, towards their partners, while maintaining a facade of normalcy with friends, colleagues, and others. This selective behavior clearly demonstrates that abusers are indeed capable of controlling their actions. They choose to exert their abusive behaviors where they feel most empowered to do so—within the confines of their intimate relationships.

6. “I Had a Rough Childhood”

While past trauma can influence behavior, abusers may use their difficult backgrounds as justification for abuse. This manipulative tactic seeks to evoke pity and understanding, rather than addressing and changing abusive patterns.

Saying they had a tough childhood turns attention away from what they’re doing wrong in the present and instead focuses attention on their past, making people feel sorry for them instead of calling them out. This makes their partner think they should be more understanding and put up with the abuse. It’s a sneaky way to avoid getting blamed and makes the victim deal with the abuser’s old problems.

7. “You’re Misinterpreting Things”

Gaslighting, or manipulating someone into questioning their reality, is a form of psychological abuse where abusers deny the victim’s experience. This excuse serves to invalidate the victim’s feelings and perceptions, further entrenching the power imbalance.

When abusers say you’re taking things the wrong way, they’re twisting the truth to make you doubt what you know and feel. This trick makes you trust their word over your own thoughts, giving them more control over you. It’s a clever way for them to keep you under their thumb, making sure you second-guess yourself anytime you think they’re in the wrong. This makes it harder for you to stand up to them because you start to question if you’re the one that is seeing things wrong.

8. “I Promise It Won’t Happen Again”

Following abusive episodes, abusers often make empty promises of change. When abusers say “It won’t happen again” but keep repeating the behavior, they’re playing a game to keep their partner from leaving. This cycle, characterized by episodes of abuse followed by remorse and false promises, is a pattern identified by researchers as a tactic to keep victims hopeful for a change that never materializes. The victim ends up stuck, always waiting for an improvement that never comes.

9. “It’s Just Because I Was Drunk”

Blaming abusive behavior on alcohol or substance use is another common excuse. While substances can exacerbate violence, they do not cause abusive behavior; this excuse shifts blame away from the abuser’s choices and actions.

An abuser uses this tactic to try to dodge responsibility, acting as if the alcohol made them do it. But drinking doesn’t make someone abusive; it just might show more of who they already are.

10. “No One Will Believe You”

Abusers may undermine the victim’s credibility, suggesting that attempts to seek help or expose the abuse will be futile. This tactic isolates the victim further and discourages them from reaching out for support.

This strategy is designed to make a victim doubt if anyone would take their side or help them. This makes the individual scared to tell anyone about the abuse, leaving them feeling alone and stuck. This not only stops them from getting support but also makes them feel like their story doesn’t matter to others.

Abusers will use every trick in the book to try to excuse their behavior. My ex-husband, who was born in a different country and culture to my own, would tell me that his behavior was ‘normal’ in his country and failure to accept that meant I was being racist.

Recognizing these excuses for what they are—manipulations designed to justify abuse and maintain control—is the first step in breaking the cycle of abuse. Victims and those around them must see through these rationalizations to understand that abuse is always a choice, and one for which abusers must be held accountable. Ultimately, there is no excuse for abuse, ever!

References

Bancroft, Lundy. (2002). Why Does He Do That? Inside the Minds of Angry and Controlling Men. Penguin Publishing Group.

Engel, B. (2002). The Emotionally Abusive Relationship: How to Stop Being Abused and How to Stop Abusing. John Wiley & Sons.

Evans, P. (1996). The Verbally Abusive Relationship: How to recognize it and how to respond. Adams Media Corporation.

Lambert, Carol A. (2016). Women with Controlling Partners: Taking Back Your Life from a Manipulative or Abusive Partner. New Harbinger Publications.

The Swift Shift: Why Abusers Quickly Move into New Relationships

abuse and new relationships

The end of a relationship with a controlling abuser often marks the beginning of a perplexing chapter: their rapid move into a new relationship. Understanding the motivations behind such swift moves can shed light on the dynamics of abusive relationships and the psyche of the abuser.

Seeking Control and Validation

Controlling abusers thrive on the power dynamics within relationships. Lundy Bancroft, in his pivotal work ‘Why Does He Do That? Inside the Minds of Angry and Controlling Men,’ highlights that for many abusers, relationships are not about mutual respect and love but about asserting dominance (Bancroft, 2002).

When a victim leaves, the abuser’s sense of control is shattered. This prompts a desperate need to reestablish it. Entering a new relationship swiftly is a way for the abuser to reassure themselves of their control and desirability. Essentially, they are using their new partner as a means to fill the void left by the loss of control over their previous victim.

When I left my abusive husband after 11 years of marriage, he wasted no time in his search for a new partner. Within 6 weeks of our separation, he developed a relationship with a woman in another country. He jumped on a plane to meet her and, when that didn’t work out, he was onto the next one. He even involved our then 6-year-old son in his online chats with a woman he was courting. 

The Facade of Normalcy

Patricia Evans, author of ‘The Verbally Abusive Relationship,’ discusses the abuser’s need to maintain a semblance of normalcy and superiority (Evans, 1996). By quickly finding a new partner, the abuser aims to project an image of resilience and normalcy to their social circle and, importantly, to themselves.

This rapid move is often accompanied by a narrative that paints the abuser as the wronged party in the previous relationship. This further cements their self-perceived victimhood and righteousness. This facade is essential for the abuser’s self-esteem and their manipulation of others’ perceptions.

My ex-husband worked hard to craft his new identity as a ‘family man’ and a ‘good Christian’, who would seek out a new wife. In his words, this was to “create a sense of wholeness that cannot be achieved alone.” And whilst he was convincing himself and others of his deep moral values and faith, he was getting involved on dating apps. At the same time, he was working on a relationship with a live-in home helper, and sending messages to me with attempts at reconciliation. An abuser is truly a master of disguise.

The Cycle of Abuse

In ‘Women with Controlling Partners,’ Carol Lambert discusses the cyclical pattern that defines abusive relationships (Lambert, 2016). Initially, abusers often employ ‘love-bombing,’ lavishing their partners with affection and praise during the ‘idealization’ phase. Love-bombing allows the abuser to quickly establish a facade of a perfect partner and an idyllic relationship. This allows them to captivate the new victim’s emotions and loyalty from the onset. However, this period is eventually overshadowed by ‘devaluation,’ where the partner endures criticism and belittlement.

By entering a new relationship swiftly, abusers are able to restart this cycle. They indulge in the early ‘honeymoon’ phase that dwindled as their previous relationship progressed. This repetitive cycle provides a psychological thrill for the abuser. It also helps conceal their manipulative behavior from both themselves and their new partner.

The swift move of an abuser into a new relationship post-breakup is a maneuver driven by deep psychological needs and patterns of behavior. Understanding these motivations is crucial for survivors. It helps them to contextualize the end of the relationship and the abuser’s subsequent actions. It is important for survivors to focus on their healing journey. This allows them to recognize that the abuser’s actions are a reflection of their issues, not the worth or desirability of the survivor.

References

Bancroft, L. (2002). Why Does He Do That? Inside the Minds of Angry and Controlling Men. Berkley Books.

Evans, P. (1996). The Verbally Abusive Relationship: How to recognize it and how to respond. Adams Media Corporation.

Lambert, C. (2016). Women with Controlling Partners: Taking Back Your Life from a Manipulative or Abusive Partner. New Harbinger Publications.

Cut Off and Controlled: How Abusers Isolate Their Victims

Isolation is a deliberate tactic used by abusers to exert control and dominance over their partners. By breaking down their partner’s network of support, abusers not only sever ties to potential sources of help but also increase their victim’s reliance on them. This calculated erosion of social bonds and support structures traps the victim in a cycle of dependency. It makes the prospect of leaving seem insurmountable.

According to Lundy Bancroft, author of ‘Why Does He Do That? Inside the Minds of Angry and Controlling Men’, an abusive man isolates his partner for two primary reasons. First, he wants her life to revolve entirely around him and his needs. If his partner has an active social life and her own hobbies and interests, she will have less time to devote to him. Second, he doesn’t wish for her to gain any sources of strength that might lead to her becoming independent. Often without full awareness, abusive individuals understand that a woman’s social connections can empower her. This gives her the means to break free from his dominance.

“Being connected with family and friends who care about you gives you access to support and, at times, opportunities to hear their concerns about your relationship,” writes Carol A. Lambert, author of ‘Women with Controlling Partners: Taking Back Your Life from a Manipulative or Abusive Partner’. “Your partner does not want you to hear that your loved ones worry about the way he treats you. These outside influences can undermine his control.” (p.116).

Abuser’s Isolate Due to Insecurities

Ultimately, an abuser isolates his partner because of his own insecurities. A controlling man feels threatened when his partner’s life does not revolve around him. Therefore, he may fear that his partner will leave him or that he will lose control within the relationship.   

During my marriage to a controlling husband, we mainly had friends that we both knew and socialized with. However, after moving to a new country, I formed a close, personal friendship that he wasn’t part of. He began to speak negatively about my friend and tried to limit our time together. Shortly after I left my husband, he made many admissions to me, hoping to convince me to return. His explanation about his behavior was very revealing. He wrote: “Until now we had all the same friends, so it was a big change for me to understand and accept that you would have a friend of your own. It was the loneliness that I was feeling, and you were my only real friend in my mind so I was afraid that she will take that away from me.”

There are many strategies a controlling individual uses to create isolation and dependency in their partner. Here are some of the most common ways.

Severing Social Connections

One primary strategy of isolation involves the abuser gradually limiting their partner’s interactions with friends, family, and the broader community. This might begin with subtle suggestions that certain friends are not looking out for their best interests. It may then move into outright accusations of family members being intrusive or disruptive to the couple’s relationship. Over time, these suggestions can escalate into demands. The abuser might explicitly forbid the victim from seeing specific people or attending social gatherings, effectively cutting off their support network.

“He might move his girlfriend or wife to a home far from her family and friends, where she does not know people and is likely to feel lonely,” writes Lisa Aronson Fontes in ‘Invisible Chains: Overcoming Coercive Control in Your Intimate Relationship.’ “He might limit her phone calls, insist that she share all her social media or e-mail contacts with him, and require that she talk to friends or family “on her own time,” such as during the workday, so he can have her undivided attention in the evening and on weekends.” (pp. 15-16)

Psychological Manipulation

Psychological tactics play a significant role in the isolation process. Abusers may use guilt, shame, or fear to keep their partner from seeking support. This could involve making their partner feel guilty for wanting to spend time with others or instilling fear about the consequences of reaching out for help. Abusers may also spread lies or rumors about the victim to friends and family. This undermines their relationships and credibility, making it more difficult for them to seek support.

“A man may isolate his partner in many ways without appearing cruel or controlling. His efforts to have her all to himself may initially feel like love,” writes Lisa Aronson Fontes in ‘Invisible Chains’. “He just cannot get enough of her. He says he wants to protect her from harm and doesn’t want her to tire herself out.” (p. 15).

While living abroad with my husband, isolated from my family and friends, our son was born. After his birth, my husband declared that I could only visit my home country with our son once every four years. He argued that he was too young to travel, that the radiation of a transatlantic flight would damage his developing brain, and that he may contract illnesses. My objections were met with accusations of selfishness and disregard for our son’s well-being. He also suggested that my wish to visit my family meant that I loved them more than him and I was therefore damaging our marriage.

Control Over Communication

Abusers often take steps to monitor and control all forms of their partner’s communication. This could range from insisting on having access to their partner’s personal email and social media accounts to listening in on phone conversations or outright forbidding them from using these communication tools without supervision. By controlling who their partner can talk to and what information they can access, the abuser creates a reality in which they are the primary, if not the sole, source of the victim’s social interaction and information about the outside world.

Financial Control

Another critical strategy involves controlling the victim’s financial resources, making it difficult or impossible for them to engage in activities outside the home or to seek help. This might include withholding money, placing strict allowances on spending, or preventing their partner from working. Without financial independence, the woman becomes economically dependent on the abuser, further limiting their ability to reach out to others or to leave the abusive situation.

“An abusive man might isolate a woman by controlling her finances, denying payment for basic needs, or taking away her money through threats, trickery, violence, and outright theft. He might demand that she pay all their joint expenses including rent, food, and utilities. He might deny his wife a credit card or insist that all their cards be held jointly and then deliberately ruin her credit. While he makes large expenditures on his own, he requires that she justify even small expenses.” (Fontes, 2015, p. 19)

Creating a Sense of Dependence

Ultimately, these strategies converge to create a situation where the victim feels wholly dependent on the abuser, not just for physical and financial needs, but for emotional support as well. This dependency traps women in the abusive relationship, making it challenging to reach out for help or escape the cycle of abuse.

“The isolation results in serious hidden injuries including increased dependency on your partner that gives him more power and influence over you, while you feel the slow deterioration of your spirit,” writes Carol A. Lambert in ‘Women with Controlling Partners’. “With very little or no social contact, you become secluded and alone and, in the confinement, your reliance on your partner naturally grows. All the more, you look to the person controlling your life for what you need. In this place of isolation and dispirited state of mind, you feel less inclined to resist your partner.” (pp. 118-119).

Isolation is a deliberate, calculated effort by abusers to ensure their partner feels powerless, disconnected, and unable to leave. Breaking free from isolation involves recognizing the abuse, reconnecting with support networks, seeking professional guidance, and carefully planning for safety and independence. Empowerment begins with the understanding that you deserve a life free from abuse, supported by people who respect and care for you. Seeking help is a sign of strength, and the path to freedom, while challenging, is a journey worth taking for your safety and well-being.

References

Bancroft, Lundy. (2002). Why Does He Do That? Inside the Minds of Angry and Controlling Men. Penguin Publishing Group.

Fontes, Lisa Aronson. (2015). Invisible Chains: Overcoming Coercive Control in Your Intimate RelationshipGuilford Publications.

Lambert, Carol A. (2016). Women with Controlling Partners: Taking Back Your Life from a Manipulative or Abusive Partner. New Harbinger Publications.

Words That Wound: Distinguishing Verbal Abuse from Normal Arguments

verbal abuse

Every relationship encounters disagreements and conflicts, and at times, these can escalate into shouting and name-calling. We can all lose our temper and say things that are unkind and not truly reflective of our feelings. So, what distinguishes an ordinary argument from verbal abuse?

The key distinction is in how often these heated exchanges occur and the nature of the verbal sling shots that are made. In healthy relationships, intense arguments are typically isolated incidents that do not define the relationship’s core dynamic. These moments are recognized by both individuals as departures from their usual way of interacting and usually result in sincere apologies, meaningful conversations about the disagreement, and concerted efforts to reach a resolution.

According to relationship expert John Gottman, healthy conflicts involve a willingness to understand the other person’s perspective and to find common ground or compromise (Gottman & Silver, 1999). Such disagreements are temporary and focused on specific issues, without damaging the relationship’s foundation.

In an abusive relationship, verbal attacks are frequent and are aimed at controlling, demeaning, and undermining the other partner. Instead of addressing a specific behavior or choice, abusers target the very essence of who you are. It is a deliberate strategy to exert power and diminish your sense of self.

Patricia Evans, in her groundbreaking work ‘The Verbally Abusive Relationship’ explains that verbal abuse is a violation, not a conflict: “There is a definite difference between conflict and abuse. In a conflict each participant wants something different. In order to resolve the conflict, the two people in the relationship discuss their wants, needs, and reasons while mutually seeking a creative solution. There may or may not be a solution, but no one forces, dominates, or controls the other.”

Identifying Verbal Abuse

Verbal abuse often starts subtly, making it difficult for victims to recognize it. The abuser might disguise their harmful comments as jokes or sarcasm, gradually escalating to more overt insults and degradation over time. This insidious progression traps the victim in a cycle of confusion and self-doubt, questioning their perception of the abuse and the abuser’s intent. Patricia Evans (1996) emphasizes the importance of trusting one’s feelings and instincts in these situations; if the comments or behaviors consistently make you feel belittled or worthless, it’s a significant indicator of verbal abuse.

Furthermore, verbal abusers often employ tactics such as blame-shifting and denial to evade accountability. They might accuse the victim of being overly sensitive or misinterpreting their words, further entangling the victim in a web of confusion and self-blame. Here are some of the most common forms of verbal abuse.

Name-Calling and Swearing

Name-calling and swearing stand as some of the most overt and recognizable forms of verbal abuse. These tactics are often employed by abusers who feel a deep sense of powerlessness, driving them to seek control and dominance over their partners by demeaning and shaming them. The use of derogatory labels and insults, such as calling someone “stupid,” “fat,” “lazy,” or “worthless,” directly attacks the victim’s character and self-worth. This strategy is not just about expressing dissatisfaction with a specific action or choice; it’s aimed at systematically weakening the partner’s sense of self. By highlighting and exaggerating perceived flaws, the abuser seeks to disempower and diminish the victim, asserting control within the relationship.

Insults like “You never know what you’re talking about” or “You’re just too dumb to grasp what I’m saying” are tools designed to belittle and undermine the victim. According to Barrie Davenport (2016) in ‘Signs of Emotional Abuse’, this psychological maneuvering is calculated—the more frequently and intensely the victim is insulted, the more likely they are to internalize these negative perceptions, leading to a gradual erosion of self-esteem. This erosion is precisely the abuser’s goal; as the victim’s confidence wanes, the abuser’s influence and dominance escalate.

Gaslighting

Gaslighting is a subtle yet potent form of abuse that undermines a partner’s confidence in their own perceptions and emotions, leading them to question the validity of their feelings and reality. This manipulation technique involves discounting the partner’s experiences, making them feel their emotions are insignificant, incorrect, or even crazy. Common phrases like “You’re too sensitive,” “You can’t take a joke,” “You’re remembering it all wrong,” or “You’re making a big deal out of nothing,” are used invalidate the partner’s feelings and perceptions.

As a result, the person on the receiving end of gaslighting might find themselves constantly apologizing for actions they didn’t commit, feeling isolated, and losing the ability to trust their judgment, often leading to a damaging dependency on the abuser’s version of reality.

Abusers employing gaslighting tactics might deny events ever happened, question the victim’s memory of facts, or pretend not to understand what the victim is saying. Over time, the victim may start believing there is something fundamentally wrong with them, their sense of humor, or their ability to perceive situations correctly. This cycle of manipulation and control can cause profound psychological distress, leaving the victim feeling trapped in a distorted reality where they question every thought and memory.

Throughout my marriage to an emotionally abusive husband, whenever we disagreed and I showed the slightest hint of anger, he would make comments such as, “You don’t have control over your own mind,” or “You are insane and don’t know how to think.” Even though I knew that I wasn’t “insane”, the constant gaslighting left me feeling that I had to hide my anger, worried that he would think I was crazy or unbalanced if I were to ever express it.

Jokes and Sarcasm

Jokes and sarcasm, when used disparagingly, can be a subtle form of verbal abuse that undermines a partner’s dignity and self-worth (Evans, 1996). Such comments, often veiled as humor, may target the partner’s gender, intelligence, or capabilities, leaving the victim feeling demeaned and disrespected. Examples of these so-called jokes include remarks like “Maybe we should just put you in charge of tying shoes, anything more seems too complicated for you,” or “It’s a good thing you’re pretty, because you can’t handle simple tasks.”

While light sarcasm and humor can be part of healthy interactions, constant sarcastic comments and making the partner the butt of jokes is damaging. Initially, these remarks might seem harmless or amusing, which is why they can be difficult to identify as abuse. However, over time, what starts as playful banter can escalate into relentless condescension and mockery, as seen in comments like, “With the way you eat, it’s no surprise you’re not fitting into your jeans anymore!” Such patterns of communication erode the quality of the relationship, turning supposed jest into a tool for belittlement.

Accusing and Blaming

Verbal abusers often blame their partners for things that aren’t their fault, such as their own feelings of anger or insecurity. For example, if a partner says they feel distant, the abuser might snap back, “Stop criticizing me!”. If I tried to raise any issues in my relationship, my husband would snap back, “You just love making me angry, don’t you?”. In this way, the abuser avoids discussing real issues or their partner’s emotions by turning themselves into the victim.

Blame-shifting is a common tactic used by verbal abusers, where they put the fault of their actions or feelings onto their partner, dodging responsibility. For instance, they might say, “It’s your fault we’re always late!” or accuse them of causing their anger, “You’re making me angry on purpose!” They might also unjustly accuse their partner out of jealousy, with accusations like, “You’re definitely cheating on me!” This leads to the partner questioning their own behavior, further controlling and damaging their self-esteem.

In ‘Women with Controlling Partners,’ Carol Lambert discusses how abusers often unjustly blame their partners for incidents beyond their control. I recall one day that I came home with a punctured car tire and told my husband that I would need to get it repaired. He was furious at the inconvenience and snarled “Just drive more carefully next time!”, as though, somehow, I should have spotted that tiny nail on the road and avoided it.

During another challenging time, my husband and I both caught Covid. While his symptoms were mild, I was severely ill and was struggling to look after our then 5-year-old son. When I asked for his help, he became enraged, telling me, “You decided you’re going to be sick and now that’s your reality. You’ve got it into your head that you want to be a statistic, so now you have to deal with it.” I was left bewildered at his response, questioning how my being ill could be seen as my own doing. Being too unwell to argue, I found it simpler to soldier on and manage the childcare duties alone rather than dispute his lack of support.

Devaluing and Belittling

Devaluing and belittling are potent forms of verbal abuse where the abuser systematically undermines the victim’s self-worth and accomplishments. Through diminishing comments like, “You really don’t know what you’re talking about, do you?” or “I don’t know why I expect more from you,” the abuser trivializes the victim’s thoughts, feelings, and achievements. This constant disparagement not only erodes the victim’s confidence but also isolates them from their sense of competence and value. By making their partner feel insignificant and inadequate, the abuser exerts control and reinforces their dominance in the relationship, leaving the victim feeling powerless and dependent.

Brian Davenport explains that by putting you down and making you feel unworthy, an abuser is trying to empower himself: “Rather than viewing you as an equal and worthy of praise, support, and respect, your abusive partner belittles you to disempower you and chip away at your self-worth. The lower you feel, the more control he or she has.” (Davenport, 2016)

At the height of the Covid pandemic, my ex-husband was convinced that society was teetering on the brink of civil unrest, World War III, and a global collapse. He frequently cited political analysts to back up his dire predictions. Whenever I found the courage to disagree with his outlook, he would react with rage, saying “So, you think you’re smarter than all the top political experts?”, and “Do you think you know more than the world’s leading minds?”, and “This Harvard Professor thinks the same as me; are you saying you’re more brilliant than a Harvard Professor?” His reactions completely invalidated my views, pushing me into silence and convincing me it was safer to keep my thoughts to myself.

Threats

Abusers often use threats to manipulate their partners, exploiting their fears to maintain control. These threats typically involve the risk of loss or injury, with statements like, “If you leave me, you’ll never see the kids again,” or “Go to that work party, and you’ll come back to an empty house.”

This tactic instills a pervasive sense of fear and uncertainty, forcing the partner to comply to avoid the repercussions. Threats can also include the possibility of physical harm or the exposure of personal secrets. Such behavior erodes the foundation of trust and security that’s essential in any healthy relationship.

Recognizing threats as a form of abuse can be challenging, especially when they’re veiled in seemingly casual remarks that hint at dire outcomes, like “Wouldn’t it be tragic if something were to happen to your beloved pet while you’re away?” These subtle, manipulative comments are designed to coerce and control under the guise of concern.

In my marriage, threats were a frequent tool of manipulation. After seeing an astrologer, my husband became convinced that we needed to move countries. When I expressed reluctance, his go-to response was: “If you don’t like it, I will just take our child and leave without you.”  

Furthermore, he often chose inopportune moments to bring up significant financial discussions, like while I was busy cooking dinner. When I suggested a better time for such conversations, he’d quickly retort, “Fine! If you won’t talk now, I’ll handle all the financial decisions on my own.”

However, the most severe threats emerged post-separation. Accustomed to unilateral decision-making, he despised needing my approval for actions such as travel with our child. Anytime that I would not agree to one of his requests, he would threaten to say terrible things about me to our son, such as that I didn’t love or care about him. He understood that the most damaging threat he could wield was one that could potentially harm our child or damage the bond I shared with him.

Verbal Abuse Can Escalate

Verbal abuse within a relationship constitutes a form of domestic abuse that often acts as a precursor to physical violence. Initially, verbal abuse might manifest through seemingly harmless put-downs masked as humor or through acts of withholding affection. Over time, however, the abuse tends to grow in intensity, frequency, and variety, incorporating more direct and varied forms of verbal assaults.

As the cycle of abuse progresses, what started as verbal can escalate into physical aggression. Initially, this might be disguised as “accidental” physical contact, such as shoves or bumps, but can quickly evolve into deliberate and severe physical attacks. This escalation from verbal to physical abuse highlights the dangerous potential of verbal abuse not just as a standalone issue but as a stepping stone to more dangerous forms of domestic violence.

Recognizing verbal abuse is the first step toward addressing it. If you suspect you might be in an unsafe situation, talk to a trusted friend or family member and seek professional help as soon as possible. Your physical and emotional safety is paramount.

References

Evans, P. (1996). The Verbally Abusive Relationship: How to recognize it and how to respond. Adams Media Corporation.

Davenport, B. (2016). Signs of Emotional Abuse: How to Recognize the Patterns of Narcissism, Manipulation, and Control in Your Love Relationship. Bold Living Press.

Gottman, J. M., & Silver, N. (1999). The Seven Principles for Making Marriage Work. Crown Publishing Group.

Lambert, Carol A. (2016) Women with Controlling Partners: Taking Back Your Life from a Manipulative or Abusive Partner. New Harbinger Publications.